17-35103492-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.629C>A(p.Ala210Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000991 in 1,614,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.71

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

RAD51D links:

ENSG00000267618 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000267618 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.835

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51D	NM_002878.4 link	c.629C>A	p.Ala210Glu	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 10	ENST00000345365.11	NP_002869.3	O75771-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51D	ENST00000345365.11 link	c.629C>A	p.Ala210Glu	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 10	1	NM_002878.4	ENSP00000338790.6		O75771-1
ENSG00000267618	ENST00000593039.5 link	c.152C>A	p.Ala51Glu	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 7	2		ENSP00000466834.1		K7EN88

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000398

AC:

AN:

251402

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135870

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000889

AC:

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000963

AC XY:

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000108

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74450

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:3

Sep 25, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Feb 19, 2025

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.A210E variant (also known as c.629C>A), located in coding exon 7 of the RAD51D gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 629. The alanine at codon 210 is replaced by glutamic acid, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This variant was detected in 1/5589 German BRCA1/2-negative probands with breast cancer (Hauke J et al. Cancer Med, 2018 Apr;7:1349-1358) and in a female with high grade serous fallopian tube cancer who carried a second RAD51D variant classified as likely pathogenic (Yang C et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2021 Feb;185:869-877). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear. -

Jul 09, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This missense variant replaces alanine with glutamic acid at codon 210 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with ovarian cancer who also carried the variant RAD51D c.82G>A, (p.Val28Met) that was reported to disrupt RNA splicing (PMID: 33452952), as well as in two individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 29522266, 33471991). This variant has been identified in 1/251402 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4

Uncertain:3

Nov 03, 2023

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 210 of the RAD51D protein (p.Ala210Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs376855484, gnomAD 0.003%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast and fallopian tube cancer (PMID: 29522266, 33452952). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 410563). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed for this missense variant. However, the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on RAD51D protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Mar 21, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:2

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The RAD51D c.629C>A (p.Ala210Glu) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 3/246188 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000122, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic RAD51D variant (0.000125). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) until additional information becomes available. -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jan 30, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/251402 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 29522266 (2018) and 33471991 (2021)) and in an individual with high grade serous fallopian tube cancer however the individual also carried another variant (RAD51D c.82G>A) which was suggested to be the cause of the disease (PMID: 33452952 (2021)).Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Sep 20, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Also known as c.293C>A p.(Ala98Glu); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29522266, 21111057, 14704354, 35496736, 33452952, 33471991, 35053526) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.83

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.47

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.50

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Benign

0.94

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

.;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.85

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.78

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.92

D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.28

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.83

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.21

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.3

.;.;.;M;M;.;.;.;.;.

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.4

.;.;.;D;N;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.62

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

.;.;.;D;T;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.

Polyphen

1.0

.;.;.;D;D;D;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.86

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.42

ClinPred

0.96

GERP RS

5.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.88

gMVP

0.79

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over