17-35106468-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.494G>A(p.Arg165Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.139 in 1,611,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,336 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | NM_002878.4 | c.494G>A | p.Arg165Gln | missense_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000345365.11 | NP_002869.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | ENST00000345365.11 | c.494G>A | p.Arg165Gln | missense_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_002878.4 | ENSP00000338790.6 | ||
ENSG00000267618 | ENST00000593039.5 | c.17G>A | p.Arg6Gln | missense_variant | 2/7 | 2 | ENSP00000466834.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.121 AC: 18421AN: 152092Hom.: 1452 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.156 AC: 38415AN: 247030Hom.: 3695 AF XY: 0.154 AC XY: 20565AN XY: 133538
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.141 AC: 205147AN: 1458982Hom.: 15881 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.141 AC XY: 102408AN XY: 725640
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.121 AC: 18427AN: 152210Hom.: 1455 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.125 AC XY: 9284AN XY: 74424
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 18, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | May 10, 2023 | This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28202063) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 18, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 05, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at