17-35107397-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.314T>C(p.Ile105Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I105M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002878.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAD51D | NM_002878.4 | MANE Select | c.314T>C | p.Ile105Thr | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | NP_002869.3 | ||
| RAD51D | NM_001142571.2 | c.374T>C | p.Ile125Thr | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | NP_001136043.1 | |||
| RAD51D | NR_037711.2 | n.340T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 9 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAD51D | ENST00000345365.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.314T>C | p.Ile105Thr | missense | Exon 4 of 10 | ENSP00000338790.6 | ||
| RAD51D | ENST00000586186.3 | TSL:1 | c.314T>C | p.Ile105Thr | missense | Exon 4 of 9 | ENSP00000468273.3 | ||
| RAD51D | ENST00000585343.5 | TSL:1 | n.*136T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 6 | ENSP00000465007.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251316 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.I105T variant (also known as c.314T>C), located in coding exon 4 of the RAD51D gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 314. The isoleucine at codon 105 is replaced by threonine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:1
In summary, this variant is a rare missense change with uncertain impact on protein function. There is no indication that it causes disease, but the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. This variant is present in population databases (rs368838910, ExAC 0.001%) but has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a RAD51D-related disease. This sequence change replaces isoleucine with threonine at codon 105 of the RAD51D protein (p.Ile105Thr). The isoleucine residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between isoleucine and threonine.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at