17-35119118-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP3BP6BS2
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.137C>G(p.Ser46Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,613,388 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
4
9
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.75
Genes affected
RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.779
BP6
Variant 17-35119118-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-35119118-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127882.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=12}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | NM_002878.4 | c.137C>G | p.Ser46Cys | missense_variant | 2/10 | ENST00000345365.11 | NP_002869.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD51D | ENST00000345365.11 | c.137C>G | p.Ser46Cys | missense_variant | 2/10 | 1 | NM_002878.4 | ENSP00000338790.6 | ||
ENSG00000267618 | ENST00000593039.5 | c.3+2173C>G | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000466834.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000756 AC: 19AN: 251312Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000589 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
251312
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000105 AC: 154AN: 1461198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000949 AC XY: 69AN XY: 726940
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
154
AN:
1461198
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
726940
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74356
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74356
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
9
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:15Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 22, 2023 | Published functional studies demonstrates a damaging effect: decrease in protein stability resulting in defective homology directed repair activity (Alenezi et al., 2022); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22986143, 27616075, 21822267, 35264596, 25938944, 35565380, 32522261, 34923718, 33630411, 33471991, 36315097, 21111057) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 06, 2023 | In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 35264596 (2022), 35565380 (2022), 33471991 (2021) see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/RAD51D), 27616075 (2016), 21822267 (2011), 22986143 (2012)), Lynch syndrome (PMID: 33630411 (2021)), and colorectal cancer (PMID: 25938944 (2015)). Additionally, the variant has been reported in healthy individuals (PMIDs: 33471991 (2021) see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/RAD51D), 22986143 (2012)). One experimental study reports the variant impacts proper RAD51D function, however further studies are needed to determine the global impact of this variant (PMID: 35565380 (2022)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00013 (17/129118 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 15, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 06, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 46 of the RAD51D protein (p.Ser46Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs587780102, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, multiple adenomatous polyps, and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 22986143, 25938944, 27616075, 32522261, 33630411, 35565380). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127882). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects RAD51D function (PMID: 35565380). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 02, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 02, 2023 | Variant summary: RAD51D c.137C>G (p.Ser46Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the RAD51D, N-terminal domain (IPR048943) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.6e-05 in 251312 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in RAD51D causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (7.6e-05 vs 0.00013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant was found in the FLOSSIES database in two European women older than age 70 years who have never had cancer. c.137C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast, Ovarian and Colorectal Cancer (Alenezi_2022, Kraus_2017, Wickramanayake_2012, Loveday_2011, Weren_2015, Velazquez_2020, Guindalini_2022, de Oliveira_2022). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported in a Lynch Syndrome case (MSH2 c.2459-1G>C, Ferrer-Avargues_2021). At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, suggesting impaired homologous recombination functionality (Alenezi_2022). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 35565380, 33630411, 35264596, 27616075, 21822267, 32522261, 25938944, 22986143, 35534704). 11 submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified this variant as uncertain significance (n=10) and likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 07, 2023 | This missense variant replaces serine with cysteine at codon 46 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has shown the mutant protein to exhibit significantly reduced homology-directed DNA repair function and protein stability (PMID: 35565380). This variant has been observed in at least three individuals affected with ovarian cancer (PMID: 21822267, 22986143, 35565380), in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 27616075), and an individual affected with multiple adenomatous polyps (PMID: 25938944). This variant has not shown a significant association with breast cancer in a large case-control study (3/60463 cases, 1/53460 controls; OR=2.653; 95%CI 0.276 to 25.502; p-value=0.628; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID FNDC8_000019) (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been observed in two individuals age 70 years or older without cancer (FLOSSIES; https://whi.color.com/variant/17-33446137-G-C). This variant has been identified in 22/282706 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 13, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 05, 2021 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 03, 2020 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The RAD51D p.Ser46Cys variant was identified in 1 of 1172 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0009) from individuals or families with unselected ovarian cancer or at high risk of breast cancer (and negative for breast and ovarian cancer genes); it was identified in an ovarian cancer case (Wickramanayake 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs587780102) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified uncertain significance by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae, ARUP Laboratories and Color Genomics Inc), and Clinvitae (3x), but was not identified in Cosmic and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 25 of 276898 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00009 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). It was observed in the following populations: “Other” in 1 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 4 of 34418 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001) and European Non-Finnish in 20 of 126540 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); but not in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Ser46 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the Cys variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;D;.;.;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M;M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;.
Polyphen
D;D;D;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at