Variant 17-3636803-G-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_004937.3(CTNS):c.-258G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00249 in 152,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

CTNS
NM_004937.3 5_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.227

Variant links:

Genes affected

CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

CTNS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00249 (379/152358) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00325 (221/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0029. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 161 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CTNS	NM_004937.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.-258G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/12	ENST00000046640.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CTNS	ENST00000046640.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.-258G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/12	1	NM_004937.3	P1	O60931-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00249

AC:

379

AN:

152240

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000579

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00229

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0248

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00325

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00240

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

174

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00249

AC:

379

AN:

152358

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00216

AC XY:

161

AN XY:

74510

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00229

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0248

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00325

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00328

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00247

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ocular cystinosis

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephropathic cystinosis

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

Cadd

Benign

6.8

Dann

Benign

0.75

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.0

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over