17-3656529-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004937.3(CTNS):​c.504G>A​(p.Thr168Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.184 in 1,603,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28,811 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 2048 hom., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.19 ( 26763 hom. )

Consequence

CTNS
NM_004937.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.823
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTNS (HGNC:2518): (cystinosin, lysosomal cystine transporter) This gene encodes a seven-transmembrane domain protein that functions to transport cystine out of lysosomes. Its activity is driven by the H+ electrochemical gradient of the lysosomal membrane. Mutations in this gene cause cystinosis, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 17-3656529-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-3656529-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257154.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-3656529-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.823 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.19 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CTNSNM_004937.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.504G>A p.Thr168Thr synonymous_variant 8/12 ENST00000046640.9 NP_004928.2 O60931-1A0A0S2Z3K3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CTNSENST00000046640.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.504G>A p.Thr168Thr synonymous_variant 8/121 NM_004937.3 ENSP00000046640.4 O60931-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.151
AC:
21548
AN:
142748
Hom.:
2043
Cov.:
22
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0426
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0590
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.194
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.125
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.200
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.167
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.232
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.171
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.160
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.184
AC:
45835
AN:
249472
Hom.:
4481
AF XY:
0.183
AC XY:
24783
AN XY:
135122
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0385
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.232
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.130
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.202
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.168
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.186
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.188
AC:
274004
AN:
1461020
Hom.:
26763
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.187
AC XY:
135920
AN XY:
726802
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0357
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.228
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.167
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.183
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.151
AC:
21565
AN:
142856
Hom.:
2048
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.153
AC XY:
10529
AN XY:
69028
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0425
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.194
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.201
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.168
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.232
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.190
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.163
Alfa
AF:
0.165
Hom.:
1222
Bravo
AF:
0.145
Asia WGS
AF:
0.196
AC:
681
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 21, 2016p.Thr168Thr in exon 8 of CTNS: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 26.02% (1536/5904) of Finnish chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broa dinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1800528). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 12, 2017- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 16, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 14, 2018- -
Ocular cystinosis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Nephropathic cystinosis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Juvenile nephropathic cystinosis;C0950123:Inborn genetic diseases;C2931013:Ocular cystinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Cystinosis Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800528; hg19: chr17-3559823; COSMIC: COSV50440774; COSMIC: COSV50440774; API