17-39712078-C-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_004448.4(ERBB2):c.1021+31C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000304 in 1,613,518 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000025 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
ERBB2
NM_004448.4 intron
NM_004448.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.49
Genes affected
ERBB2 (HGNC:3430): (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) This gene encodes a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases. This protein has no ligand binding domain of its own and therefore cannot bind growth factors. However, it does bind tightly to other ligand-bound EGF receptor family members to form a heterodimer, stabilizing ligand binding and enhancing kinase-mediated activation of downstream signalling pathways, such as those involving mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. Allelic variations at amino acid positions 654 and 655 of isoform a (positions 624 and 625 of isoform b) have been reported, with the most common allele, Ile654/Ile655, shown here. Amplification and/or overexpression of this gene has been reported in numerous cancers, including breast and ovarian tumors. Alternative splicing results in several additional transcript variants, some encoding different isoforms and others that have not been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000854 (13/152314) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000415 (2/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000129. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 3 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000320 AC: 8AN: 250170Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000369 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135352
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
250170
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135352
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000246 AC: 36AN: 1461204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 726916
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
1461204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
726916
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
40
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: not provided
Submissions summary: Other:1
Revision: no classification provided
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at