17-39963001-G-T
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000635792.1(GSDMA):c.-5-2682G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.557 in 152,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23,721 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.56 ( 23671 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.53 ( 50 hom. )
Consequence
GSDMA
ENST00000635792.1 intron
ENST00000635792.1 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.964
Publications
39 publications found
Genes affected
GSDMA (HGNC:13311): (gasdermin A) Predicted to enable phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding activity; phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate binding activity; and phosphatidylserine binding activity. Involved in apoptotic process. Located in perinuclear region of cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.565 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.557 AC: 84590AN: 151794Hom.: 23651 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
84590
AN:
151794
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.525 AC: 186AN: 354Hom.: 50 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.550 AC XY: 142AN XY: 258 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
186
AN:
354
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
142
AN XY:
258
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
10
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
2
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
2
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
44
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
22
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
18
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
4
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
133
AN:
244
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
8
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.557 AC: 84645AN: 151912Hom.: 23671 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.556 AC XY: 41259AN XY: 74234 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
84645
AN:
151912
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
41259
AN XY:
74234
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
22683
AN:
41394
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
8595
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1728
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2955
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2475
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
5786
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
38679
AN:
67934
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1143
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1888
3776
5665
7553
9441
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
734
1468
2202
2936
3670
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1914
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.