17-40289549-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_001254.4(CDC6):c.129C>T(p.Thr43=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Consequence
CDC6
NM_001254.4 synonymous
NM_001254.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.56
Genes affected
CDC6 (HGNC:1744): (cell division cycle 6) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc6, a protein essential for the initiation of DNA replication. This protein functions as a regulator at the early steps of DNA replication. It localizes in cell nucleus during cell cyle G1, but translocates to the cytoplasm at the start of S phase. The subcellular translocation of this protein during cell cyle is regulated through its phosphorylation by Cdks. Transcription of this protein was reported to be regulated in response to mitogenic signals through transcriptional control mechanism involving E2F proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.56 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC6 | NM_001254.4 | c.129C>T | p.Thr43= | synonymous_variant | 2/12 | ENST00000209728.9 | NP_001245.1 | |
CDC6 | XM_011525541.3 | c.129C>T | p.Thr43= | synonymous_variant | 2/13 | XP_011523843.1 | ||
CDC6 | XM_011525542.2 | c.129C>T | p.Thr43= | synonymous_variant | 2/13 | XP_011523844.1 | ||
CDC6 | XM_047437207.1 | c.129C>T | p.Thr43= | synonymous_variant | 2/12 | XP_047293163.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC6 | ENST00000209728.9 | c.129C>T | p.Thr43= | synonymous_variant | 2/12 | 1 | NM_001254.4 | ENSP00000209728 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
31
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Meier-Gorlin syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at