17-41767421-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002230.4(JUP):​c.867C>T​(p.Thr289Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 112 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 58 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 54 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.94

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
JUP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • inherited epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Naxos disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 17-41767421-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41767421-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36425.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.94 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0528 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002230.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
JUP
NM_002230.4
MANE Select
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 14NP_002221.1
JUP
NM_001352773.2
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 14NP_001339702.1
JUP
NM_001352774.2
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 15NP_001339703.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
JUP
ENST00000393931.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 14ENSP00000377508.3
JUP
ENST00000310706.9
TSL:1
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 15ENSP00000311113.5
JUP
ENST00000393930.5
TSL:5
c.867C>Tp.Thr289Thr
synonymous
Exon 5 of 15ENSP00000377507.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0145
AC:
2202
AN:
152180
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0514
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00958
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00368
AC:
925
AN:
251408
AF XY:
0.00263
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0525
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000489
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00146
AC:
2137
AN:
1461866
Hom.:
54
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.00125
AC XY:
908
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0549
AC:
1839
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
63
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000126
AC:
5
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53398
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
8
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000513
AC:
57
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00265
AC:
160
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
139
277
416
554
693
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0146
AC:
2222
AN:
152300
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0144
AC XY:
1070
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0517
AC:
2149
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00288
AC:
44
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000772
AC:
4
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00948
AC:
20
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
103
206
308
411
514
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00639
Hom.:
11
Bravo
AF:
0.0165
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 06, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Jul 30, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Naxos disease Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 17, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 28, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Aug 18, 2011
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.9
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2230407; hg19: chr17-39923673; API