17-41812828-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting
The ENST00000429461(FKBP10):c.-117C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000446 in 657,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00027 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
FKBP10
ENST00000429461 5_prime_UTR
ENST00000429461 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.481
Genes affected
FKBP10 (HGNC:18169): (FKBP prolyl isomerase 10) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) family. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and acts as a molecular chaperone. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been reported, but their biological validity has not been determined.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000499 (252/505416) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.000929 (2/2152). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000666. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 152 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 6. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
use as main transcript | n.41812828C>T | intergenic_region |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKBP10 | ENST00000429461 | c.-117C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/4 | 3 | ENSP00000408232.1 | ||||
FKBP10 | ENST00000585664.5 | c.-23+89C>T | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000468703.1 | |||||
FKBP10 | ENST00000585922.5 | c.-6+89C>T | intron_variant | 4 | ENSP00000466097.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000499 AC: 252AN: 505416Hom.: 0 Cov.: 6 AF XY: 0.000570 AC XY: 152AN XY: 266820
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
252
AN:
505416
Hom.:
Cov.:
6
AF XY:
AC XY:
152
AN XY:
266820
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000269 AC: 41AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74392
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74392
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Osteogenesis imperfecta type 11 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at