17-41812858-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The ENST00000429461.5(FKBP10):​c.-87C>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00042 in 815,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FKBP10
ENST00000429461.5 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.302

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FKBP10 (HGNC:18169): (FKBP prolyl isomerase 10) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) family. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and acts as a molecular chaperone. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been reported, but their biological validity has not been determined.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
FKBP10 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bruck syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 11
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Illumina
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • arthrogryposis-like syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Bruck syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00139 (212/152212) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00499 (207/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00443. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 97 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FKBP10NM_021939.4 linkc.-177C>G upstream_gene_variant ENST00000321562.9 NP_068758.3 Q96AY3-1A0A024R1W3Q8NAG5Q658U4
FKBP10XM_011525099.4 linkc.-177C>G upstream_gene_variant XP_011523401.1
FKBP10XM_011525100.3 linkc.-304C>G upstream_gene_variant XP_011523402.1
FKBP10XM_047436515.1 linkc.-304C>G upstream_gene_variant XP_047292471.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FKBP10ENST00000321562.9 linkc.-177C>G upstream_gene_variant 1 NM_021939.4 ENSP00000317232.4 Q96AY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00139
AC:
211
AN:
152094
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00498
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000197
AC:
131
AN:
663630
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
9
AF XY:
0.000180
AC XY:
62
AN XY:
343896
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00646
AC:
116
AN:
17944
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
4
AN:
31134
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
17478
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
56556
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31040
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2516
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000680
AC:
3
AN:
441166
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000238
AC:
8
AN:
33634
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
15
22
30
37
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00139
AC:
212
AN:
152212
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00130
AC XY:
97
AN XY:
74412
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00499
AC:
207
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
26
40
53
66
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000285
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00158

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 11 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
5.4
DANN
Benign
0.37
PhyloP100
0.30
PromoterAI
-0.21
Neutral

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs555053677; hg19: chr17-39969110; API