17-42541185-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000263.4(NAGLU):c.1000G>T(p.Val334Phe) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,460,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V334I) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000263.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mucopolysaccharidosis type 3BInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2VInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000263.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAGLU | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1000G>T | p.Val334Phe | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000225927.1 | P54802 | ||
| NAGLU | c.1078G>T | p.Val360Phe | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000633488.1 | ||||
| NAGLU | c.1057G>T | p.Val353Phe | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000574980.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000130 AC: 19AN: 1460936Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 726810 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at