17-43045812-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.5468-10C>A variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000786 in 1,613,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 (6 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 (5 hom.)
• Consequence: BRCA1 NM_007294.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.001610
• Clinical Significance: Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1 B:27 O:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.166

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
• BP6: Variant 17-43045812-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43045812-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 55589.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43045812-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0043 (655/152258) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0145 (601/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0135. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 326 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4	c.5468-10C>A		splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9	c.5468-10C>A		splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_007294.4	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00430 AC: 654 AN: 152140 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0145

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00255

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00573

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00120 AC: 301 AN: 250432 Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000974 AC XY: 132 AN XY: 135456

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0152

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00104

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000710

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00130

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000419 AC: 613 AN: 1461508 Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000374 AC XY: 272 AN XY: 727044

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0136

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00125

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000216

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00106

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00430 AC: 655 AN: 152258 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00438 AC XY: 326 AN XY: 74450

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0145

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00255

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00567

Alfa AF: 0.00146 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00513

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:27 Other:1

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	Jul 19, 2017	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jun 14, 2020	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Aug 15, 2023	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Jul 08, 2015	- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1 Benign:6 Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	in vitro	Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington	-	- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)	May 29, 2002	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan	Apr 21, 2016	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Pathway Genomics	Jul 24, 2014	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	BRCAlab, Lund University	Mar 02, 2020	- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panel	curation	Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)	Jan 12, 2015	Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.01626 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	literature only	Counsyl	Jan 02, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center	Jul 07, 2023	- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State	Apr 19, 2022	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Apr 07, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	research	Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer	Nov 01, 2021	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Dec 06, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Nov 18, 2014	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	May 21, 2020	- -

not provided Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Apr 01, 2024	BRCA1: BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Nov 22, 2023	- -

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Mar 10, 2022

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

-

The BRCA1 c.5468-10C>A variant was identified in 3 of 4550 proband chromosomes from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (frequency: 0.001); however control chromosomes were not included in these studies (Borg 2010, Tommasi 2008, Uhrhammer 2008).The variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. One functional study did not find any effect of the variant on splicing (Houdayer 2012), and in-silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predicts a greater than 10% difference in splicing in only 2 of 5 different programs, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, and the BIC database (15X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (31X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified in four samples as co-occurring a pathogenic variant (two in BRCA1 and two in BRCA2), increasing the likelihood that the variant does not have clinical importance. The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs8176316) with a minor allele frequency of 0.004 (1000 Genomes Project) and an average heterozygosity of 0.007+/-0.060. Furthermore, this variant occurs at a frequency of greater than 1% in some populations of origin and is therefore classified as a polymorphism (African American alleles in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) (frequency: 0.014), HapMap-YRI (frequency: 0.018), HAPMAP-LWK (frequency: 0.017), and HAPMAP-ASW (frequency: 0.01)). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Baylor Genetics

Feb 23, 2017

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.38
Cadd	Benign	15
Dann	Benign	0.79

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.0016
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.12
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8176316; hg19: chr17-41197829;