17-43049147-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.5380G>A(p.Glu1794Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E1794D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.5380G>A | p.Glu1794Lys | missense_variant | 21/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.5380G>A | p.Glu1794Lys | missense_variant | 21/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251452Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Mar 23, 2023 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 1794 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). This variant has been reported to be functional in a haploid cell proliferation assay (PMID: 30209399). This variant has been reported in three individuals without history of cancer (PMID: 32467295) and three individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 32803532), and it also has been detected in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_000886). This variant has been identified in 1/251452 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 12, 2024 | Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43049147:C>T was assigned evidence codes ['BS3', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely benign - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Breast Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research | May 01, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 27, 2022 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1794 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Glu1794Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs776323117, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 32803532). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 865677). Advanced modeling of experimental studies (such as gene expression, population dynamics, functional pathways, and cell-cycle effects in cell culture) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA1 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BRCA1 function (PMID: 30209399). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
BRCA1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 31, 2023 | The BRCA1 c.5380G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu1794Lys. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (Table 3, Kim et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 31907386; Wan et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 32803532; Table S1, Dong et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32467295). This variant was also found in an individual with pancreatic cancer who had no family history of cancer (eTable 4: described as Glu1815Lys, Yin et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35171259). This variant is reported in 0.0054% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-41201164-C-T). This variant has been reported in ClinVar as having conflicting interpretations ranging from likely benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/865677/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 15, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at