17-43067689-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM1BP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4993G>A(p.Val1665Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000096 in 1,458,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1665A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251308 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000960 AC: 14AN: 1458680Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 725904 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:3Benign:1
- -
- -
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
The BRCA1 p.Val1665Met variant was identified in 2 of 4406 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from individuals or families with breast and ovarian cancer (Azzollini 2016, Claes 2004). It was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80357169) as "With Uncertain significance, other allele", in ClinVar (classified 5x as Likely benign by GeneDx, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, SCRP and one other submitter and 4x Uncertain significance by submitters), LOVD 3.0 (observed 5x), UMD-LSDB (8 records of unknown clinical significance) and in the BIC Database (4x unknown clinical importance). The variant was identified in control databases in 4 of 246102 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33580 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European in 3 of 111586 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish or South Asian populations. rnA range of functional, evolutionary, biochemical and computational studies have involved the variant with conflicting interpretations. Transcriptional assay studies demonstrated the variant displayed similar activity to wild-type controls in both yeast and mammalian cells, suggesting a “benign polymorphism” (Vallon-Christersson 2001). No functional effect of the variant was also demonstrated in another study that looked at protein folding, peptide biding activity and specificity and transcriptional activity in human cells in comparison to the wild-type control (Lee 2010). A biophysical study measuring thermodynamic stability of the BRCA1 BRCT domains classified the variant as “mildly destabilizing” protein folding when compared to the wild-type (Rowling 2010). Two computational studies also had conflicting variant classifications of “neutral” and as a “variant of unknown significance” (Karchin 2007, Iversen 2011). The p.Val1665 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20378548, 24753228, 25348012, 15026808, 15172985, 15350310, 17305420, 17308087, 20516115, 11157798, 10946236, 26206375, 28781887, 27062684, 21447777, 20423312, 18403564, 15133502, 12531920, 30209399, 30765603, 31159747) -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.4993G>A (p.Val1665Met) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the BRCT domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 246102 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance; the possibility of the variant being a rare polymorphism cannot be excluded. c.4993G>A has been reported in the literature in breast and/or ovarian cancer families and was noted to not segregate with disease in at least one reported family (Azzollini_2016, Claes_2004). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported in the BIC database (BRCA2 c.1754delA, p.Lys585fsX29; BRCA2 c.2830A>T, p.Lys944X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function demonstrated the variant to have no functional effect and to display wild-type activity (Findlay_2018, Lee_2010, Vallon-Christersson_2001). Six ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign (3x) and as uncertain significance (3x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at