17-43071011-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.4903G>A​(p.Glu1635Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0220
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.11505297).
BP6
Variant 17-43071011-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43071011-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41829.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5, not_provided=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr17-43071011-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4903G>A p.Glu1635Lys missense_variant 15/23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1 P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4903G>A p.Glu1635Lys missense_variant 15/231 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3 P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251386
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135878
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000342
AC:
5
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00000550
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152224
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylOct 18, 2016- -
not provided, no classification providedin vitroBrotman Baty Institute, University of Washington-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMar 17, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationLupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of MedicineApr 12, 2024Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43071011:C>T was assigned evidence codes ['BS3', 'BP1_Strong'] and an overall classification of Benign -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 13, 2022Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: variant classified as functional based on a saturation genome editing (SGE) assay measuring cell survival (Findlay et al., 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Observed in an individual with ovarian cancer (Carney et al., 2010); Also known as 5022G>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22703879, 30209399, 31131967, 21218378) -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSep 23, 2021- -
BRCA1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 12, 2024The BRCA1 c.4903G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu1635Lys. This variant was observed in a patient with ovarian cancer (Table 1. Carney ME et al 2010. PubMed ID: 21218378). This variant was also reported in a patient with polyps who had a family history of pancreas cancer, colorectum, other GI cancer, polyps, and melanoma. This individual also carried MSH6, PTEN, and BMPR1A variants (Table. S4 Bhai et al 2021. PubMed ID: 34326862). Functional studies have shown that this variant does not disrupt the function of BRCA1 (Johnston JJ et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22703879). This variant is reported in 0.00088% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting classifications of pathogenicity in ClinVar ranging from likely benign to uncertain significance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/41829/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 22, 2023This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 1635 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Glu1635Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs200432771, gnomAD 0.0009%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with ovarian cancer (PMID: 21218378). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 41829). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 30209399) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA1 function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BRCA1 function (PMID: 30209399). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 17, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.064
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.15
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.63
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.093
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.028
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.057
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.85
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.3
.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.89
N;N;.;N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Benign
0.49
T;T;.;T;.;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.62
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.0, 0.0030
.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.31
MVP
0.50
MPC
0.092
ClinPred
0.23
T
GERP RS
0.26
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.028
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200432771; hg19: chr17-41223028; COSMIC: COSV105897876; API