Menu
GeneBe

17-43071077-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4837A>G(p.Ser1613Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.338 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94,249 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1613A?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 8007 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 86242 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:34O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.194
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr17-43071076-CT-GGC is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 180697.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=3.0711293E-4).
BP6
Variant 17-43071077-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43071077-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41827.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43071077-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-43071077-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43071077-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.476 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4837A>G p.Ser1613Gly missense_variant 15/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4837A>G p.Ser1613Gly missense_variant 15/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.318
AC:
48290
AN:
151926
Hom.:
8001
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.237
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.285
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.329
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.362
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.371
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.493
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.404
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.354
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.332
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.333
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.354
AC:
88974
AN:
251384
Hom.:
16559
AF XY:
0.362
AC XY:
49183
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.240
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.317
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.374
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.380
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.504
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.403
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.326
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.348
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.340
AC:
496800
AN:
1461858
Hom.:
86242
Cov.:
59
AF XY:
0.345
AC XY:
250799
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.233
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.321
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.368
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.499
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.396
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.327
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.340
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.318
AC:
48324
AN:
152044
Hom.:
8007
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.324
AC XY:
24084
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.237
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.330
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.362
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.370
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.492
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.404
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.332
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.337
Alfa
AF:
0.327
Hom.:
14702
Bravo
AF:
0.303
TwinsUK
AF:
0.339
AC:
1258
ALSPAC
AF:
0.337
AC:
1300
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.243
AC:
1069
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.327
AC:
2809
ExAC
AF:
0.349
AC:
42424
Asia WGS
AF:
0.411
AC:
1430
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.324
EpiControl
AF:
0.333

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:34Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:11Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000000309. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.3322 (Asian), 0.2195 (African), 0.3615 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 22, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 32.7 %. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided, no classification providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
not specified Benign:8Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 07, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSANov 01, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Ser1613Gly variant was identified extensively in the literature from individuals or families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers, and also control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Shattuck-Eidens 1997, Tavtigian 2006, Tommasi 2008, Phelan 2005, McKean-Cowdin 2005, Johnson 2007, Ho-Gay 2000, Greenman 1998, Forat-Yazdi 2015, Diez 2003, Abkevich 2004, Carvalho 2007). Most of the studies have concluded the p.Ser1613Gly variant benign or a polymorphism. The variant was also identified in our laboratory and in dbSNP (ID: rs1799966) with benign/other allele; in the 1000 Genomes Project in 1782 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.3558); in HapMap-CEU in 151 of 220 chromosomes (frequency: 0.686363); HapMap-YRI in 187 of 226 chromosomes (frequency: 0.8274333); HapMap-MKK in 224 of 286 chromosomes (frequency: 0.78321677). In Exome Variant Server project the variant was identified in 2809 of 8600 (freq: 0.326627) European American and in 1069 of 4406 (freq: 0.2426) African American alleles. In the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) the variant was identified in 42424 of 121360 chromosomes, with 7852 homozygotes (frequency: 0.3496) from a population of South Asians, European (Non-Finnish), East Asian, African, Latino, European (Finnish) and other individuals. The variant was identified in GeneInsight COGR, Clinvar (8 of 10 submitters classified as benign), Clinvitae, COSMIC, BRCA Share-UMD (co-occurred with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants), BIC, ARUP, LOVD and Fanconi’s Anemia LOVD databases. The p.Ser1613 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 08, 2013- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicNov 28, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 06, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJan 02, 2022- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesMay 03, 2020- -
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 06, 2022- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCenter of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care-- -
Breast carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityApr 03, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
Cadd
Benign
6.9
Dann
Benign
0.97
Eigen
Benign
-0.86
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.91
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.031
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.00031
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;N;.;N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
0.040
D;D;.;T;.;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;D;T;T;T;D;T;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.26, 0.0020
.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.30
MPC
0.076
ClinPred
0.0023
T
GERP RS
1.5
Varity_R
0.057
gMVP
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799966; hg19: chr17-41223094; COSMIC: COSV58783381; COSMIC: COSV58783381; API