17-43071185-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4729T>C(p.Ser1577Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000083 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1577Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.4729T>C | p.Ser1577Pro | missense_variant | Exon 15 of 23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.4729T>C | p.Ser1577Pro | missense_variant | Exon 15 of 23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000438 AC: 11AN: 251316 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000910 AC: 133AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000894 AC XY: 65AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
not provided Benign:3
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27383479, 28288110, 23704879, 19016756, 17100994, 16949048, 12496477, 19491284, 22217648, 16455195, 27124784, 30415210, 28111427, 30765603, 31131967, 28781887)
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
not specified Benign:2
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.4729T>C (p.Ser1577Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.6e-05 in 251842 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00054 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not higher than the maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Syndrome (0.001). However, in certain East Asian subpopulations the variant was observed with an even higher occurrence, e.g. in the Japanese control population it occurred with a frequency of 0.0055 (jMorp database), suggesting a benign role for the variant. The variant, c.4729T>C, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, as well as in several unaffected controls, who were almost exclusively of East Asian origin. Two recent case-control association studies, involving breast cancer patients and controls of Korean- (Park_2017) and Japanese ancestry (Momozawa_2018), found that the variant is not associated with a significant increase in breast/ovarian cancer risk, and therefore the authors of these studies classified that the variant as likely benign/benign, respectively. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (ATM c.7456C>T (p.Arg2486X) in Ohmoto_2018; and BRCA2 c.6952C>T (p.Arg2318X), and BRCA2 c.6486_6489delACAA (p.Lys2162AsnfsX5) in two internal LCA samples), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated that the variant protein had a slightly stronger transcriptional activity than the wild type; therefore, authors classified the variant as "not likely pathogenic" (Woods 2016). Six other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign (1x) / likely benign (5x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at