17-43082453-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4308T>C(p.Ser1436Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.334 in 1,613,730 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 92,806 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 7439 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 85367 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 synonymous
NM_007294.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.103
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-43082453-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43082453-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 125703.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43082453-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-43082453-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.103 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.475 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.4308T>C | p.Ser1436Ser | synonymous_variant | 12/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.4308T>C | p.Ser1436Ser | synonymous_variant | 12/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.301 AC: 45723AN: 151996Hom.: 7437 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
45723
AN:
151996
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.349 AC: 87615AN: 251392Hom.: 16196 AF XY: 0.358 AC XY: 48594AN XY: 135864
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
87615
AN:
251392
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
48594
AN XY:
135864
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.338 AC: 493418AN: 1461616Hom.: 85367 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.343 AC XY: 249269AN XY: 727112
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
493418
AN:
1461616
Hom.:
Cov.:
41
AF XY:
AC XY:
249269
AN XY:
727112
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.301 AC: 45729AN: 152114Hom.: 7439 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.307 AC XY: 22841AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
45729
AN:
152114
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
22841
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1410
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:29Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:10Other:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jan 12, 2015 | Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.3304 (Asian), 0.128 (African), 0.3588 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
not provided, no classification provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Jan 02, 2014 | High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 32.6 %. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Mar 22, 2011 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 07, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | #N/A - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 30, 2015 | p.Ser1436Ser in exon 12 of BRCA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 34.3% of chromosomes from all pop ulations by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.o rg; dbSNP rs1060915). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 07, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 31, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | - | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Nov 09, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at