17-43091931-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):āc.3600G>Cā(p.Gln1200His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000215 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin Lovd.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.3600G>C | p.Gln1200His | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.3600G>C | p.Gln1200His | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00112 AC: 170AN: 152214Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000231 AC: 58AN: 250966Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000177 AC XY: 24AN XY: 135682
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000117 AC: 171AN: 1461796Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000114 AC XY: 83AN XY: 727180
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152332Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 95AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Sep 03, 2014 | - - |
not specified Benign:3Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 25, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 02, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 28, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Nov 16, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | Nov 04, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 09, 2020 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Gln1200His variant was identified in at least 11 of 122840 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.005) from individuals or families with breast cancer, ovarian cancer or prostate cancer, and was identified in 1 of 2892 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) (Anczukow 2008, Capanu 2011, Caux-Moncoutier 2011, Judkins 2005, Lee 2008, McKean-Cowdin 2005, Newman 1998, Osorio 2007, Zuhlke 2004). The variant was also identified in the HGMD, UMD (7X as a neutral variant), and the BIC database (17X with no clinical importance). The variant was listed in UMD with a co-occurring pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.5041insATTA (p.Thr1681IlefsX3)), and Judkins (2005) also identified the variant in trans with a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation (BRCA1 4730insG), increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical importance. The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs56214134) with a minor allele frequency of 0.001 (1000 Genomes Project), and in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with a frequency of 0.003 in African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. This residue is not conserved in mammals and lower organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. A functional study by Anczukow (2008) did not detect an effect of the variant on intron 11 splicing efficiency. In addition, two in silico studies using multifactorial likelihood ratio models suggest that this is likely a neutral variant (Lindor 2012, Osorio 2007). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at