17-43092113-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -24 ACMG points: 0P and 24B. BA1BP5_StrongBP1_StrongBS3BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.3418A>G variant in BRCA1 is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of Serine by Glycine at amino acid 1140 (p.Ser1140Gly). The highest non-cancer, non-founder population filter allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset, read depth ≥20) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset, read depth ≥20) is 0.03171 in the African/African-American population, which is above the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1 (BA1 met). This missense variant is located outside of a key functional domain and was not predicted to alter mRNA splicing using the SpliceAI predictor (score 0.06, score threshold <0.1) (BP1_Strong met). Reported by one calibrated study to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMID:32546644) (BS3 met). This variant has been observed in more than 10 individuals with features considered inconsistent with an FA-associated phenotype, and (Likely) Pathogenic variant seen in trans or variant is homozygous (total score 4 points) (BS2 met; Invitae internal contributor). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.00029 (based on Co-occurrence LR=0.00029), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; PMID:16014699). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA1-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BA1, BP1_Strong, BS3, BS2, BP5_Very strong). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA002212/MONDO:0011450/092

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0097 ( 34 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:32O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.301
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -24 ACMG points.

BP1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP5
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS3
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkc.3418A>G p.Ser1140Gly missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1 P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkc.3418A>G p.Ser1140Gly missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3 P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00970
AC:
1476
AN:
152222
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
633
AN:
251092
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00166
AC XY:
226
AN XY:
135768
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0335
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000980
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1532
AN:
1461540
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.000873
AC XY:
635
AN XY:
727082
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0350
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00217
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00972
AC:
1481
AN:
152340
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00906
AC XY:
675
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00662
Alfa
AF:
0.00270
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.0105
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0309
AC:
136
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
377
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:32Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:7
Mar 02, 2020
BRCAlab, Lund University
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 22, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2014
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 01, 2016
Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of North Norway
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002
Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:7Other:1
Mar 03, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1, c.3418A>G, p.Ser1140Gly variant has been reported in the literature in at least 18/44788 proband chromosomes of individuals with sporadic as well as high-risk breast and /or ovarian cancer. It has also been found in 4/5118 control chromosomes evaluated (Tavtigian_2006_16014699, Abkevich_2004_15235020, Johnson_2007_17341484, McKean-Cowdin_2005_15726418, Alsop_2012_22711857, Elstrodt_2006_16397213, Tazzite_2012_22425665, Velasco_2005_15937982, Soegaard_2008_18559594). It is listed in the dbSNP database (ID#: rs2227945) as coming from a clinical source with a minor allele frequency of 0.011, having been observed in 25 chromosomes (1000 genomes), increasing the likelihood that this is benign variant. It has been listed in the UMD (x14 as neutral), BIC (x29 as UV) and the CNPHI (ACMG 3) databases. In addition, in the UMD mutation database, the variant was observed to co-occur with pathogenic BRCA1 [c.2890G>T (p.Gly964X) and c.415C>T (p.Gln139X)] as well as BRCA2 [c.2092delC (p.Leu698TyrfsX32)] variants, increasing the likelihood that p.Ser1140Gly is benign. This residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid Glycine (Gly) is present in the mouse. Computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) does not predict any effect on the protein function, increasing the likelihood this variant does not have functional significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 05, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Oct 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Oct 09, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2017
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 15, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021
Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 26, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 18, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 03, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jul 06, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Jun 11, 2024
ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

The c.3418A>G variant in BRCA1 is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of Serine by Glycine at amino acid 1140 (p.Ser1140Gly). The highest non-cancer, non-founder population filter allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1 (exomes only, non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) or gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer subset, read depth >=20) is 0.03171 in the African/African-American population, which is above the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP threshold (>0.001) for BA1 (BA1 met). This missense variant is located outside of a key functional domain and was not predicted to alter mRNA splicing using the SpliceAI predictor (score 0.06, score threshold <0.1) (BP1_Strong met). Reported by one calibrated study to exhibit protein function similar to benign control variants (PMID: 32546644) (BS3 met). This variant has been observed in more than 10 individuals with features considered inconsistent with an FA-associated phenotype, and (Likely) Pathogenic variant seen in trans or variant is homozygous (total score 4 points) (BS2 met; Invitae internal contributor). Multifactorial likelihood ratio analysis using clinically calibrated data produced a combined LR for this variant of 0.00029 (based on Co-occurrence LR=0.00029), below the threshold for Very strong benign evidence (LR <0.00285) (BP5_Very strong met; PMID: 16014699). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as a Benign variant for BRCA1-related cancer predisposition based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 VCEP (BA1, BP1_Strong, BS3, BS2, BP5_Very strong). -

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Oct 21, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Sep 25, 2018
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.87
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.34
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.96
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.98
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.051
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.46
T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0027
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;M;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.069
Sift
Benign
0.32
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.21
MVP
0.52
MPC
0.083
ClinPred
0.0094
T
GERP RS
1.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.044
gMVP
0.057

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2227945; hg19: chr17-41244130; COSMIC: COSV58797608; COSMIC: COSV58797608; API