17-43092115-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The ENST00000357654.9(BRCA1):​c.3416G>T​(p.Ser1139Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000116 in 1,461,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1139R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9 missense

Scores

7
12

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:6B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.19
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.25714988).
BP6
Variant 17-43092115-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43092115-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 54873.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3416G>T p.Ser1139Ile missense_variant 10/23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.3416G>T p.Ser1139Ile missense_variant 10/231 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251078
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135756
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
17
AN:
1461586
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.0000165
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
727106
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000135
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000334
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000302
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:8
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 18, 2019IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000012 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Nov 25, 2004- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 02, 2023Variant summary: BRCA1 c.3416G>T (p.Ser1139Ile) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.2e-05 in 1455818 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (1.2e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3416G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (e.g., Borg_2010, Meyer_2003, Bhai_2021), however without strong evidence for causality (e.g., lack of co-segregation data). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (e.g., Bouwman_2020). The results of this study showed no damaging effect of this variant on homology directed repair (HDR) activity by illustrating no impairment of the variant to complement BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells in homologous recombination DNA repair (HRR) using a direct GFP HRR assay as well as cisplatin and olaparib sensitivity assays. HDR assays qualify as a recognized gold standard on the basis of updated guidance provided by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) working group (PMID: 31892348). ClinGen SVI now recognizes benign functional evidence as sufficient for categorization as likely benign (PMID: 29300386). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 20104584, 12938098, 34326862, 32546644, 16267036, 34396183). Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign/likely benign, n = 6; uncertain significance, n = 3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 11, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the BRCA1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.3416G>T, in exon 10 that results in an amino acid change, p.Ser1139Ile. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with BRCA1-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database in three individuals (dbSNP rs80357228). The p.Ser1139Ile change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the BRCA1 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Ser1139Ile substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Ser1139Ile change remains unknown at this time. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 03, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000026 (3/113598 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 12938098 (2003), 16267036 (2005), 20104584 (2010), and 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). This variant was also reported in healthy cancer-free individuals (FLOSSIES, (https://whi.color.com/), PMID: 33471991 (2021); LOVD3 Shared (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 17, 2020Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20104584, 12938098, 23704879, 31131967, 16267036, 10923033) -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 17, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 14, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 22, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 07, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
BRCA1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 05, 2023The BRCA1 c.3416G>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ser1139Ile. This variant was reported in at least one patient with breast cancer, however, no other information was available (for example, supple. Table 2 in Borg et al. 2010. PubMed ID: 20104584). Of note, this variant occurs within a region of the BRCA1 gene that is predicted to be tolerant to variation (Table 2, Dines et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 31911673). This variant is reported in 0.0026% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-41244132-C-A). This variant is classified as benign, or uncertain variant in ClinVar (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/54873/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
0.0082
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.12
CADD
Benign
9.8
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.58
D;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.86
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.050
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.18
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.26
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.46
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.2
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.51
Sift
Uncertain
0.0060
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.015
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.39
B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.36
MVP
0.46
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.22
T
GERP RS
-5.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.6
Varity_R
0.088
gMVP
0.18

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80357228; hg19: chr17-41244132; API