17-43092798-T-C

Variant names:

• chr17-43092798-T-C
• rs1800740
• NM_007294.4:c.2733A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.2733A>G​(p.Gly911Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000602 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 (3 hom.)
• Consequence: BRCA1 NM_007294.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1 B:25
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0500

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
• BP6: Variant 17-43092798-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43092798-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 54664.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43092798-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43092798-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.05 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4	c.2733A>G	p.Gly911Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9	c.2733A>G	p.Gly911Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000664 AC: 101 AN: 152192 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000965

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00203

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00893

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.000188

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000367

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00102 AC: 255 AN: 250784 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 146 AN XY: 135502

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00232

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0111

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000353

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00197

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000596 AC: 871 AN: 1461680 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 52 AF XY: 0.000613 AC XY: 446 AN XY: 727120

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000538

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00221

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00949

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000510

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000150

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000308

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00167

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000663 AC: 101 AN: 152310 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000658 AC XY: 49 AN XY: 74468

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000962

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00893

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.000188

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000368

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000945

Alfa AF: 0.000855 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000963

EpiCase AF: 0.000654

EpiControl AF: 0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:25

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1 Benign:8

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Gly911Gly variant has been identified in 12 out of 8424 proband chromosomes (frequency 0.001) in individuals with sporadic and familial breast and ovarian cancer phenotype; and was absent in 48 control chromosomes included in these studies (Judkins 2005, van der Hout 2006, Uhrhammer 2008, Caux-Moncoutier 2009, Borg 2010). It is listed in dbSNP database” (ID#: rs1800740) while no information was provided, however, in the exome server it is found in 5/8595 (frequency 0.0006) in European and 1/4405 (frequency 0.0003) in African populations, suggesting that this is a benign variant. In addition, in the UMD database, this variant has been identified in 2 (out of 43) individuals with breast or ovarian cancers, where a second pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was also detected, further suggesting that this is a benign variant. In addition, it was identified by our laboratory in one individual with a second pathogenic variant. This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction. In addition, in-silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predicts no change in the splice site prediction score. In summary, based on above information this variant is classified as Benign -

Jun 29, 2017

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -

Jan 25, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2017

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2011

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2010

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 14, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not specified Benign:5

Aug 12, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 22, 2018

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017

Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5

Nov 25, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

-

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA1: BP4, BP7 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Apr 27, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 25, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 28, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3

Nov 16, 2021

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Jan 18, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.86
CADD	Benign	3.0
DANN	Benign	0.51

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800740; hg19: chr17-41244815;