17-43092967-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP3_ModerateBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2564A>C(p.Gln855Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000031 in 1,613,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q855K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726772 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152260Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74392 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
This missense variant replaces glutamine with proline at codon 855 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in multiple cancer case-control studies in which the disease-association is inconclusive. Breast cancer case-control studies have reported this variant in 3/7051 female breast cancer cases and 3/11241 unaffected individuals and 0/53 male cases and 5/12490 unaffected controls (PMID: 30287823) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 0/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_005004). This variant has been reported in a pancreatic cancer case-control study in 8/23705 unaffected individuals and absent in 1005 cases (PMID: 32980694) and in a prostate cancer case-control study in 3/7637 cases and 5/12366 unaffected individuals (PMID: 31214711). A multifactorial analysis has reported likelihood ratios for pathogenicity based on segregation and tumor pathology of 1.0498 and 0.4, respectively (PMID: 31131967). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Although there is a suspicion that this variant may not be associated with disease, additional studies are necessary to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
The p.Q855P variant (also known as c.2564A>C), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA1 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 2564. The glutamine at codon 855 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration was identified in individuals pursuing BRCA1/2 analysis in Japan (Nakamura S et al. Breast Cancer, 2015 Sep;22:462-8; Arai M et al. J Hum Genet, 2018 Apr;63:447-457). This variant has also been identified in breast cancer cohorts as well as unaffected control groups across studies (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun, 2018 10;9:4083; Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Also known as 2683A>C; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30287823, 33087888, 29176636, 31131967, 20305393, 24359602, 11802209, 24249303) -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2564A>C (p.Gln855Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.7e-05 in 298848 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publications), predominantly at a frequency of 1.7e-04 within 47462 Japanese controls who were 60 years old or over and did not have past history nor family history of cancers (Momozawa_2018). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2564A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (e.g. Meindl 2002, Nakamura 2015, Momozawa_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. A co-occurrence with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant has been reported (Nakamura_2015; co-occurring variant not specified), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. A recent publication involving the ENIGMA network of collaborators (Parsons_2019) assigned a classification of Likely Benign based on likelihood ratios (LRs) for pathogenicity estimated from clinical data of co-segregation with disease, breast tumor pathology and bioinformatic predictions; however, no specific data was provided for independent assessment. Four ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance until additional data of clinical and/or functional importance becomes available. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at