17-43093054-G-T

Variant names:

• chr17-43093054-G-T
• rs28897683
• NM_007294.4:c.2477C>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4 BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.2477C>A​(p.Thr826Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000341 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T826A) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: BRCA1 NM_007294.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3 B:28
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.182

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.27411184).
• BP6: Variant 17-43093054-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093054-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37473.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43093054-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43093054-G-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr17-43093054-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4	c.2477C>A	p.Thr826Lys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9	c.2477C>A	p.Thr826Lys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000204 AC: 31 AN: 152130 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000121

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000262

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000323

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000179 AC: 45 AN: 250902 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 22 AN XY: 135618

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000326

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000355 AC: 519 AN: 1461564 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.000329 AC XY: 239 AN XY: 727110

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000188

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000433

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000397

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000204 AC: 31 AN: 152248 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12 AN XY: 74434

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000323

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000356 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000174

TwinsUK AF: 0.00108 AC: 4

ALSPAC AF: 0.000519 AC: 2

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ESP6500EA AF: 0.000349 AC: 3

ExAC AF: 0.000181 AC: 22

EpiCase AF: 0.000545

EpiControl AF: 0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:28

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2 Benign:6

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1 p.Thr826Lys variant was identified in 12 of 6080 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer and was not identified in 372 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Simard 2007, Capanu 2011, Tonin 1998, Palomba 2009, Klemp 2000, Dean 2015). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs28897683) as “with other allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by ENIGMA expert panel in 2015, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Gene Dx and 6 other submitters; as likely benign by Counsyl, Color and 2 other submitters; and as uncertain significance by BIC and 3 other submitters), LOVD 3.0 (observed 17x) and UMD-LSDB (observed 33x). The variant was identified in control databases in 52 of 276616 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 4 of 24,028 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 8 of 34,412 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) and European in 40 of 126,296 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The variant was observed in the UMD-LSDB database in 3 cases with co-occurring pathogenic variants: BRCA1 c.3669del (p.Cys1225Alafs*10), BRCA1 c.4251_4252del (p.Leu1418Argfs*9), and BRCA2 c.6359C>G (p.Ser2120*). In a complementation assay in BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, the variant was demonstrated to have no observed effect on cell proliferation and sensitivity to cisplatin, indicating the variant protein activity was sufficient to complement the BRCA1-null cells (Bouwman 2013). The p.Thr826 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Jun 12, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 03, 2020

Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000203 -

not specified Benign:8

Jan 31, 2022

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Thr826Lys variant in BRCA1 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.03% (40/128816) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant was classified as Benign on August 10, 2015 by the ClinGen-approved ENIGMA expert panel (Variation ID 37473). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, BP4. -

Jul 17, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 30, 2022

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 07, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2017

Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2014

Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4

Apr 18, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA1: BS3:Supporting, BS2 -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4

Apr 25, 2016

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 26, 2021

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1 c.2477C>A (p.Thr826Lys) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.031% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-41245071-G-T). In silico tools are not in agreement about the effect of this variant on protein function, however in vitro functional studies have shown that this variant results in an activity comparable to the wild type in cell proliferation and cisplatin sensitivity assays (BS3; PMID: 23867111). This variant has been reported in four women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (BS2_supporting; https://whi.color.com/variant/17-41245071-G-T). In addition, this variant has been reported to co-occur with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BP2; UMD database). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: BS3, BS2_supporting, BP2. -

Nov 16, 2021

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3

Oct 30, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 11, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Jul 14, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1

Sep 23, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1

Aug 05, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.12
BayesDel_addAF	Uncertain	0.11	D
BayesDel_noAF	Pathogenic	0.23
CADD	Benign	15
DANN	Benign	0.95
DEOGEN2	Uncertain	0.54	D;.;.;.;T
Eigen	Benign	-0.11
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.34
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.17	N
LIST_S2	Uncertain	0.95	D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP	Uncertain	0.16	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.27	T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	-0.28	T
MutationAssessor	Pathogenic	3.3	M;M;.;.;.
PrimateAI	Benign	0.25	T
PROVEAN	Pathogenic	-5.2	D;D;D;D;.
REVEL	Uncertain	0.55
Sift	Uncertain	0.0010	D;D;D;D;.
Sift4G	Benign	0.12	T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen		0.95	P;.;.;D;.
Vest4		0.41
MVP		0.69
MPC		0.21
ClinPred		0.14	T
GERP RS		1.7
Varity_R		0.24
gMVP		0.14

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28897683; hg19: chr17-41245071; COSMIC: COSV99066389; COSMIC: COSV99066389;