17-43093119-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The ENST00000357654.9(BRCA1):c.2412G>C(p.Gln804His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000626 in 1,613,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q804E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000357654.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.2412G>C | p.Gln804His | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.2412G>C | p.Gln804His | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000599 AC: 15AN: 250542Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000517 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135418
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000630 AC: 92AN: 1461310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.0000715 AC XY: 52AN XY: 726938
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Sep 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | May 25, 2022 | The BRCA1 c.2412G>C variant is classified as Benign - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000446 - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jun 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 13, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26381082, 18446624, 28857155, 22425665, 22366370, 16644204, 21203900, 22753008, 11183185, 16489001, 11802209, 12457999, 17924331, 21990134, 15235020, 24728327) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | BRCA1: BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 28, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 19, 2021 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2412G>C (p.Gln804His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.5e-05 in 360276 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publications). This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (7.5e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.2412G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (e.g. Ellis_2000, Meindl_2002, Haffty_2005, Judkins_2005, Lalloo_2006, Wadell_2008, Tazzite_2012, Dougherty_2017, Dorling_2021) but was also reported in controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multiple co-occurrences with pathogenic variants have been reported (e.g. BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA, p.Lys437IlefsX22; BRCA2 c.8167G>C, p.Asp2723His; BRCA2 c.2808_2811delACAA, p.Ala938fsX21) (Wadell_2008, Konecny_2011, Tazzite_2012; UMD and BIC databases), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Studies utilizing a multifactorial likelihood model for classification of variants which uses data such as co-occurrence with pathogenic mutations, co-segregation with disease, histopathology and immunochemical profiles of associated tumors and personal and family history of cancer, concluded the variant to be neutral (Chenevix-Trench_2006, Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). Six ClinVar submitters including an expert panel (ENIGMA) (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 04, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 12, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 21, 2015 | - - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 25, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at