17-43093119-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2412G>C(p.Gln804His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000626 in 1,613,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q804E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.2412G>C | p.Gln804His | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.2412G>C | p.Gln804His | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000599 AC: 15AN: 250542Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000517 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135418
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000630 AC: 92AN: 1461310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.0000715 AC XY: 52AN XY: 726938
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | May 25, 2022 | The BRCA1 c.2412G>C variant is classified as Benign - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Sep 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000446 - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 13, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26381082, 18446624, 28857155, 22425665, 22366370, 16644204, 21203900, 22753008, 11183185, 16489001, 11802209, 12457999, 17924331, 21990134, 15235020, 24728327) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 28, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jun 22, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | BRCA1: BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 19, 2021 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2412G>C (p.Gln804His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.5e-05 in 360276 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publications). This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (7.5e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.2412G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (e.g. Ellis_2000, Meindl_2002, Haffty_2005, Judkins_2005, Lalloo_2006, Wadell_2008, Tazzite_2012, Dougherty_2017, Dorling_2021) but was also reported in controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Multiple co-occurrences with pathogenic variants have been reported (e.g. BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA, p.Lys437IlefsX22; BRCA2 c.8167G>C, p.Asp2723His; BRCA2 c.2808_2811delACAA, p.Ala938fsX21) (Wadell_2008, Konecny_2011, Tazzite_2012; UMD and BIC databases), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Studies utilizing a multifactorial likelihood model for classification of variants which uses data such as co-occurrence with pathogenic mutations, co-segregation with disease, histopathology and immunochemical profiles of associated tumors and personal and family history of cancer, concluded the variant to be neutral (Chenevix-Trench_2006, Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). Six ClinVar submitters including an expert panel (ENIGMA) (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Feb 06, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 04, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 12, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 25, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at