17-43093220-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.2311T>C​(p.Leu771Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.333 in 1,613,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91,981 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L771L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 7355 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.34 ( 84626 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:30O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.442

Publications

158 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-43093220-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093220-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 125554.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.442 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.476 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkc.2311T>C p.Leu771Leu synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkc.2311T>C p.Leu771Leu synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.300
AC:
45482
AN:
151856
Hom.:
7352
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.180
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.285
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.319
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.349
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.369
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.493
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.403
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.339
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.330
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.319
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.347
AC:
87177
AN:
250946
AF XY:
0.357
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.311
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.362
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.379
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.402
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.324
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.342
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.336
AC:
491155
AN:
1461632
Hom.:
84626
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.341
AC XY:
248165
AN XY:
727128
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.174
AC:
5840
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.314
AC:
14057
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.357
AC:
9324
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.353
AC:
14001
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.498
AC:
42990
AN:
86240
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.396
AC:
21107
AN:
53330
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.366
AC:
2111
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.325
AC:
361646
AN:
1111884
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.332
AC:
20079
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20255
40510
60766
81021
101276
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11830
23660
35490
47320
59150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.299
AC:
45490
AN:
151976
Hom.:
7355
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.306
AC XY:
22737
AN XY:
74254
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.180
AC:
7450
AN:
41468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.319
AC:
4875
AN:
15260
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.349
AC:
1207
AN:
3460
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.368
AC:
1905
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.492
AC:
2370
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.403
AC:
4253
AN:
10548
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.337
AC:
99
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.330
AC:
22388
AN:
67938
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.324
AC:
683
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1613
3226
4838
6451
8064
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
478
956
1434
1912
2390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.318
Hom.:
19482
Bravo
AF:
0.282
Asia WGS
AF:
0.405
AC:
1408
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.321
EpiControl
AF:
0.331

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:30Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:10Other:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

GreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 22, 2011
Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 10, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 03, 2014
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jan 02, 2014
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 32.4 %. This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Jan 12, 2015
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.3304 (Asian), 0.128 (African), 0.3536 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30).

not specified Benign:8
Jan 07, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 18, 2017
Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 01, 2017
GeneKor MSA
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 02, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Leu771Leu in exon 10 of BRCA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 50% (8241/16498) of South Asian ch romosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs16940).

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Nov 01, 2021
Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Dec 18, 2013
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Dec 07, 2016
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Aug 01, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Feb 15, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Mar 31, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1Other:1
Feb 23, 2017
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.65
PhyloP100
-0.44
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
1.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16940; hg19: chr17-41245237; COSMIC: COSV58786443; COSMIC: COSV58786443; API