17-43093324-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2207A>C(p.Glu736Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E736K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.2207A>C | p.Glu736Ala | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.2207A>C | p.Glu736Ala | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726936
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 12, 2024 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2207A>C (p.Glu736Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250714 control chromosomes (gnomAD v2, Exomes dataset). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2207A>C has been reported in the literature in an individual with an unspecified cancer diagnosis without evidence of cosegregation (Kurian_2008), and also, in a breast cancer tumor where it was interpreted as neutral by the authors (Spearman_2008). A publication involving the ENIGMA network of collaborators (Parsons_2019) assigned a classification of likely benign based on likelihood ratios (LRs) for pathogenicity estimated from clinical data of breast tumor pathology, co-occurrence, family history and bioinformatic predictions. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24728327, 29580235, 18779604, 21990134, 22753008, 31131967, 18824701). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 37455). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 15, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 30, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 20, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22753008, 21990134, 24728327, 18824701, 18779604, 31131967) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 19, 2016 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Feb 01, 2012 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Glu736Ala variant was identified in the literature and classified using a multifactorial probability based model as likely benign, however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided (Lindor_2012_21990134). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs397507196) as “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (as likely benign by Ambry, GeneDx, Invitae, and ARUP, and as benign by SCRP), Clinvitae (4x), GeneInsight-COGR, LOVD 3.0 (2x), ARUP Laboratories (as likely benign) databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, UMD-LSDB, BIC Database, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 30964 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000032 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include East Asian in 1 of 1620 chromosomes (freq: 0.000617), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European (Non-Finnish), Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish) and South Asian populations. The p.Glu736 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at