17-43093364-T-C

Variant names:

• chr17-43093364-T-C
• rs4986845
• NM_007294.4:c.2167A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.2167A>G​(p.Asn723Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00034 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 (3 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: BRCA1 NM_007294.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2 B:29
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.375

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0073415935).
• BP6: Variant 17-43093364-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093364-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37454.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43093364-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00192 (293/152312) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0064 (266/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00577. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 148 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4	c.2167A>G	p.Asn723Asp	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9	c.2167A>G	p.Asn723Asp	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00185 AC: 281 AN: 152194 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00613

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00164

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000454 AC: 114 AN: 250902 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000369 AC XY: 50 AN XY: 135670

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00513

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000811

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000327

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000175 AC: 256 AN: 1461680 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.000168 AC XY: 122 AN XY: 727134

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00547

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000693

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000563

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00192 AC: 293 AN: 152312 Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00199 AC XY: 148 AN XY: 74478

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00640

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00164

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.000349 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00207

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00726 AC: 32

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ExAC AF: 0.000568 AC: 69

Asia WGS AF: 0.00173 AC: 6 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:29

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2 Benign:7

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 09, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000000317 -

Mar 02, 2020

BRCAlab, Lund University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Aug 11, 2008

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 24, 2021

Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1 c.2167A>G variant is classified as Benign (BS1, BS4, BP4, BP6) -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:7

Oct 03, 2016

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 11, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2014

Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2021

Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Feb 14, 2017

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2014

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 02, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Dec 08, 2017

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2

Nov 13, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24055113, 24729269, 25637381, 21990134, 15235020, 15447980, 27153395, 26332594, 16267036, 17924331, 22811390, 25948282, 22753008, 12491487, 33087888) -

Jun 05, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Sep 16, 2013

Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1

Sep 23, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA1 p.Asn723Asp variant was identified in an individual with hereditary prostate cancer (Zuhlke 2004), and in at least 20 other patients from a data set 55630 patients undergoing clinical BRCA1 mutation screening (Judkins 2005). The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (26X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (6X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was listed once as co-occurring with a known pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.-200_80del (p.Met1SerfsX13)), and Judkins (2005) identified the variant in trans with a different pathogenic BRCA1 mutation (p.Cys64Tyr), increasing the likelihood that the p.Asn723Asp variant does not have clinical importance. This residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Three in silico studies suggest that the variant is not pathogenic or of no clinical significance (Abkevich 2004, Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs4986845) “With non-pathogenic allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes Project). It was also identified in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with a frequency of 0.007 in African American alleles, and in several HapMap populations including HAPMAP-MKK (frequency: 0.014), HAPMAP-LWK (frequency: 0.011) and HAPMAP-ASW (frequency: 0.01), increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign polymorphism in certain populations of origin. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Malignant tumor of prostate Benign:1

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.099
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.33	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.25
CADD	Benign	6.7
DANN	Benign	0.97
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.41	T;.;.;.;T
Eigen	Benign	-0.94
Eigen_PC	Benign	-1.0
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.11	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.80	T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP	Benign	0.079	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0073	T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.77	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	1.4	L;L;.;.;.
PrimateAI	Benign	0.28	T
PROVEAN	Uncertain	-3.6	D;D;D;D;.
REVEL	Uncertain	0.36
Sift	Benign	0.081	T;T;T;T;.
Sift4G	Benign	0.18	T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen		0.16	B;.;.;B;.
Vest4		0.26
MVP		0.46
MPC		0.096
ClinPred		0.0043	T
GERP RS		-4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.0
Varity_R		0.13
gMVP		0.052

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs4986845; hg19: chr17-41245381;