17-43093364-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2167A>G(p.Asn723Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00034 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N723S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.2167A>G | p.Asn723Asp | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.2167A>G | p.Asn723Asp | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00185 AC: 281AN: 152194Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000454 AC: 114AN: 250902Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000369 AC XY: 50AN XY: 135670
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000175 AC: 256AN: 1461680Hom.: 1 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.000168 AC XY: 122AN XY: 727134
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00192 AC: 293AN: 152312Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00199 AC XY: 148AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:8
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Aug 11, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Aug 24, 2021 | The BRCA1 c.2167A>G variant is classified as Benign (BS1, BS4, BP4, BP6) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Apr 25, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000000317 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 09, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 11, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Jan 31, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 23, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 16, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Dec 08, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 13, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24055113, 24729269, 25637381, 21990134, 15235020, 15447980, 27153395, 26332594, 16267036, 17924331, 22811390, 25948282, 22753008, 12491487, 33087888) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 19, 2023 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | Sep 16, 2013 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Asn723Asp variant was identified in an individual with hereditary prostate cancer (Zuhlke 2004), and in at least 20 other patients from a data set 55630 patients undergoing clinical BRCA1 mutation screening (Judkins 2005). The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (26X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (6X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was listed once as co-occurring with a known pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.-200_80del (p.Met1SerfsX13)), and Judkins (2005) identified the variant in trans with a different pathogenic BRCA1 mutation (p.Cys64Tyr), increasing the likelihood that the p.Asn723Asp variant does not have clinical importance. This residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Three in silico studies suggest that the variant is not pathogenic or of no clinical significance (Abkevich 2004, Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs4986845) “With non-pathogenic allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes Project). It was also identified in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with a frequency of 0.007 in African American alleles, and in several HapMap populations including HAPMAP-MKK (frequency: 0.014), HAPMAP-LWK (frequency: 0.011) and HAPMAP-ASW (frequency: 0.01), increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign polymorphism in certain populations of origin. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Malignant tumor of prostate Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at