17-43094020-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1511G>A(p.Arg504His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R504C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.307

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22482175).

BP6

Variant 17-43094020-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43094020-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 54278.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43094020-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43094020-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 link	c.1511G>A	p.Arg504His	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1	P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 link	c.1511G>A	p.Arg504His	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283.3		P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152110

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000717

AC:

AN:

251044

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000516

AC XY:

AN XY:

135688

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000506

AC:

AN:

1461774

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000440

AC XY:

AN XY:

727168

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000104

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000423

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74428

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000149

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000453

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000659

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:16Other:1

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 22, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Aug 10, 2015

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000106 -

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 25, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant Summary: The c.1511G>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.007% (8/121170), which does not exceed the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 (0.10%). However, the frequency data should still suggest that this variant is likely to be a rare polymorphism. The variant has been reported to co-occur with many deleterious pathogenic variants in BRCA1, such as c.70_80del (8 times in BIC), c.78_79insCATCTG (1 time in BIC) and p.Ser510Ter (1 time in BIC). A publication (Tavtigian_2006) also reported co-occurrence with an unspecified deleterious BRCA1 variant in six samples. (Presence of a variant in trans with another deleterious variant in BRCA1 is a definite evidence of benign outcome and thus it is very likely that the reported co-occurrence information is in line with this notion.) Studies presenting multifactorial probability based models report the variant as a neutral variant (Easton_2007, Lindor_2012). In addition, multiple reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified the variant as neutral/likely benign/benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Dec 03, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32548945, 30287823, 18779604, 22753008, 9333265, 21990134, 17924331, 26543556, 16014699, 20858050, 15235020, 25637381, 24728327) -

Jul 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA1: BP1, BP2 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oct 22, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 15, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2Other:1

Aug 11, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2014

Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 16, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:2

Nov 16, 2021

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.066

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.15

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.50

D;.;.;.;T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.37

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.43

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.22

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.10

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.24

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

M;M;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-4.0

D;D;D;D;.;D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.66

Sift

Benign

0.085

T;T;T;T;.;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.080

T;T;T;T;.;T;.

Polyphen

0.69

P;.;.;P;.;.;.

Vest4

0.36

MVP

0.81

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.38

GERP RS

0.073

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Varity_R

0.086

gMVP

0.13

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over