17-43094044-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1487G>A(p.Arg496His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000668 in 1,613,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R496C) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.1487G>A | p.Arg496His | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.1487G>A | p.Arg496His | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 152068Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000446 AC: 112AN: 251192Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000486 AC XY: 66AN XY: 135774
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000681 AC: 995AN: 1461756Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000663 AC XY: 482AN XY: 727176
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000546 AC: 83AN: 152068Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000498 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74274
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Oct 30, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | May 08, 2014 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000188 - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of North Norway | May 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | May 28, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Oct 03, 2023 | BS1 based on allele frequency in NFE of 0.000884 in gnomAD. REVEL 0.550. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jul 10, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not specified Benign:9Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.1% (51/66708) European; ClinVar: 5 B/LB, 3 VUS - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 11, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 27, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jul 12, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 30, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2023 | BRCA1: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 07, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 29, 2014 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 22, 2023 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Arg496His variant was identified in at least 10 of 116730 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00009) from individuals or families with breast cancer, and was present in 2 of 1602 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from healthy individuals (Arnold 2002, Bodian 2014, Capanu 2011, Horvath 2013, Schoumacher 2001, Soegaard 2008, Spitzer 2000). The variant was also identified in HGMD, LOVD, the ClinVar database (classified through clinical testing as a benign variant by Invitae and GeneDX), the BIC database (86X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (15X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a 6 different co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variants, and Judkins (2005) also found the variant in trans with a known deleterious variant in BRCA1, increasing the likelihood that the p.Arg496Hisvariant does not have clinical significance. In The variant was identified by the Exome Variant Server project in 8 of 8600 European American alleles (frequency: 0.0009), and in dbSNP (ID: rs28897677) with an allele frequency of 0.002 in the ClinSeq project, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The p.Arg496 residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid histidine (His) is present in dog and opossum, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein, and in silico studies assessing evolutionary conservation, amino acid properties, or multifactorial probability based models all suggest that the variant is not pathogenic or neutral/of little clinical significance (Abkevich 2004, Capanu 2011, Lee 2008, Lindor 2011, Tavtigian 2006). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at