17-43094464-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1067A>G(p.Gln356Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0551 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,838 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.046 ( 213 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.056 ( 2625 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
1
8
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.37
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026477277).
BP6
Variant 17-43094464-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43094464-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41803.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43094464-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43094464-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr17-43094464-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0639 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.1067A>G | p.Gln356Arg | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.1067A>G | p.Gln356Arg | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0456 AC: 6942AN: 152212Hom.: 212 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6942
AN:
152212
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0465 AC: 11681AN: 251138Hom.: 398 AF XY: 0.0471 AC XY: 6396AN XY: 135736
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11681
AN:
251138
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6396
AN XY:
135736
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0560 AC: 81929AN: 1461718Hom.: 2625 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0554 AC XY: 40297AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
81929
AN:
1461718
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
40297
AN XY:
727152
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0456 AC: 6943AN: 152330Hom.: 213 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0453 AC XY: 3371AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6943
AN:
152330
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3371
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
221
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
207
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
45
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
552
ExAC
AF:
AC:
5350
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:42Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:14Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto | Jan 31, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneKor MSA | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Gln356Arg variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is identified at a high frequency in various different populations of origin. In the 1000 genomes and exome variant server databases it was identified in 658 of 22636 control chromosomes. In addition, this variant was identified in the UMD database 16 x and 3 times in the presence of a co-occuring pathogenic variant increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 23, 2016 | p.Gln356Arg in exon 10 of BRCA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 7.83% (518/6614) of Finnish chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1799950). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 15, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 13, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Pathway Genomics | Jul 24, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Mar 15, 2011 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Jan 02, 2014 | High frequency in a 1kG or ESP population: 6.4 %. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000000204. Also class 1 based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.05409 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences | May 03, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Dec 22, 1999 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Vantari Genetics | Nov 27, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 05, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 29, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Mar 02, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Apr 17, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 07, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Dec 06, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jul 13, 2012 | - - |
Breast ductal adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Next Generation Diagnostics, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc. | Jul 20, 2015 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 23, 2022 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care | - | - - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.;.;.;T;T;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;.;T;.;D;T
Polyphen
D;.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at