17-43094466-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The ENST00000357654.9(BRCA1):c.1065G>A(p.Lys355=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000923 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9 synonymous
ENST00000357654.9 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.234
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-43094466-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43094466-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 54113.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43094466-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43094466-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.234 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.1065G>A | p.Lys355= | synonymous_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.1065G>A | p.Lys355= | synonymous_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
152206
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000127 AC: 32AN: 251086Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000133 AC XY: 18AN XY: 135702
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
251086
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135702
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000903 AC: 132AN: 1461714Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000866 AC XY: 63AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
132
AN:
1461714
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
727150
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152324Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74482
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
152324
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74482
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Aug 09, 2000 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | MVZ Praenatalmedizin und Genetik Nuernberg | May 01, 2018 | This rare variant (gnomAD) was found multiple times in databases to be classified as uncertain or likely benign. Interestingly we found this variant in a patient who harbored also a pathogenic BRCA2-variant (NM_000059.3 c.1813dupA het). Therefore we rate this variant as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Jan 23, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | BRCA1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 05, 2016 | Variant summary:The BRCA1 c.1065G>A (p.Lys355Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 5/5 splicing algorithms predict no significant effect on splice donor and acceptor sites, which is consistent with an in vitro study (Anczukow et al 2008) showing that the variant did not affect splicing based on a mini-gene assay. This variant was found in 23/121396 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0003297 (22/66736). This frequency is lower than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (0.0010005), but suggests that it may be a rare polymorphism. In at least two reported patients (1 published and 1 unpublished finding from UMD), this variant co-occurred with another deleterious variant in BRCA1, strongly supporting a benign outcome. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, all evidence supports a non-pathogenic nature for the variant, and the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 16, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 02, 2015 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 16, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | Jun 19, 2012 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 05, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 13, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 01, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Lys355Lys variant was identified in 2 of 4244 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.000) from individuals or families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (Borg 2010, Ricevuto 2001). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs41286292) “With other allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.0002 (1000 Genomes Project), Exome Variant Server project in 1 of 8599 European American alleles, the ClinVar database 4X (classified as benign (BIC and GeneDx), likely benign (Counsyl) and uncertain significance (Invitae)), GeneInsight VariantWire database (2X, classified as “predicted unlikely impact” by a clinical laboratory), the BIC database (2X with no clinical importance), and UMD (17X as an unknown variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (p.Val939LeufsX61), increasing the likelihood that the p.Lys355Lys variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was also identified by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) in 22 of 66736 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003297) from a population of European (Non-Finnish) individuals, although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 2 individuals with breast cancer. The p.Lys355Lys variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at