17-43094708-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.823G>A(p.Gly275Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000286 in 1,611,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G275D) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.823G>A | p.Gly275Ser | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.823G>A | p.Gly275Ser | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 151988Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000559 AC: 140AN: 250402Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000850 AC XY: 115AN XY: 135334
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000303 AC: 442AN: 1459678Hom.: 5 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000467 AC XY: 339AN XY: 725824
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152106Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Nov 06, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | Feb 20, 2004 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Gly275Ser variant was identified in 2 of 596 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from Pakistani, Thai and Indian individuals or families with unselected, sporadic, or early-onset breast cancer and was not identified in 100 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Ahmad 2012, Juwle 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs8176153) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Invitae; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Counsyl, and Pathway Genetics; and as uncertain significance by BIC), Genesight-COGR (classified benign/likely benign/uncertain significance by 3 clinical labs), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (4x as neutral and co-occurring with a pathogenic variant: BRCA2 c.2612C>A, p.Ser871X), and BIC Database (4x with unknown clinical importance, classification pending). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was also identified in control databases in 146 (2 homozygous) of 245170 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include and South Asian in 146 (2 homozygous) of 30672 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), while not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Gly275 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood Ser impacts the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In a study using DNA methylation with sequence bioinformatics to predict pathogenicity, it was found that the variant was likely not pathogenic (Flower 2015). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 18, 2019 | Variant allele has low bioinformatic likelihood to encode a missense alteration affecting protein function (Missense prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND minor allele frequency 0.00460 (South Asian), derived from gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer (2019-05-13). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 03, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 17, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 09, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.823G>A (p.Gly275Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00056 in 250402 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0046 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.823G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer, primarily in individuals of South Asian ethnicity (example, Vinodkumar_2007, Ahmad_2012, Juwle_2012, Sirisena_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (BRCA2 c.2612C>A, p.Ser871X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Starita_2015). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a predominant consensus as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 10, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 08, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 02, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 19, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 09, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at