17-43094708-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.823G>A​(p.Gly275Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000286 in 1,611,784 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G275D) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

4
9
6

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.40
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03035742).
BP6
Variant 17-43094708-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43094708-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 55725.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43094708-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.823G>A p.Gly275Ser missense_variant 10/23 ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1 P38398-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.823G>A p.Gly275Ser missense_variant 10/231 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283.3 P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
151988
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00396
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000559
AC:
140
AN:
250402
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000850
AC XY:
115
AN XY:
135334
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00459
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000303
AC:
442
AN:
1459678
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000467
AC XY:
339
AN XY:
725824
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.01e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000216
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000125
AC:
19
AN:
152106
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000242
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74346
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00396
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000101
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.000667
AC:
81
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:19
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsNov 06, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Feb 20, 2004- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 p.Gly275Ser variant was identified in 2 of 596 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.003) from Pakistani, Thai and Indian individuals or families with unselected, sporadic, or early-onset breast cancer and was not identified in 100 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Ahmad 2012, Juwle 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs8176153) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Invitae; as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Counsyl, and Pathway Genetics; and as uncertain significance by BIC), Genesight-COGR (classified benign/likely benign/uncertain significance by 3 clinical labs), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (4x as neutral and co-occurring with a pathogenic variant: BRCA2 c.2612C>A, p.Ser871X), and BIC Database (4x with unknown clinical importance, classification pending). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang University Database. The variant was also identified in control databases in 146 (2 homozygous) of 245170 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include and South Asian in 146 (2 homozygous) of 30672 chromosomes (freq: 0.005), while not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Gly275 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood Ser impacts the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In a study using DNA methylation with sequence bioinformatics to predict pathogenicity, it was found that the variant was likely not pathogenic (Flower 2015). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jun 18, 2019Variant allele has low bioinformatic likelihood to encode a missense alteration affecting protein function (Missense prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/), AND minor allele frequency 0.00460 (South Asian), derived from gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer (2019-05-13). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 03, 2016- -
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 17, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 09, 2022Variant summary: BRCA1 c.823G>A (p.Gly275Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00056 in 250402 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0046 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4.6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.823G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer, primarily in individuals of South Asian ethnicity (example, Vinodkumar_2007, Ahmad_2012, Juwle_2012, Sirisena_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the UMD database (BRCA2 c.2612C>A, p.Ser871X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Starita_2015). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and an expert panel (ENIGMA) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a predominant consensus as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 12, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 10, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoSep 08, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 02, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 19, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 09, 2016- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 19, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.066
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.13
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.52
D;.;.;.;T;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.68
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.17
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.030
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.81
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;M;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.9
D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.66
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T;T;T;.;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;.;.;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.51
MutPred
0.73
Gain of helix (P = 0.0034);Gain of helix (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.0034);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.0034);
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.43
ClinPred
0.35
T
GERP RS
4.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.35
gMVP
0.19

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8176153; hg19: chr17-41246725; API