17-43104167-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.396C>A(p.Asn132Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000372 in 1,613,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000038 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
2
10
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.17
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 17-43104167-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43104167-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 55064.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43104167-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43104167-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.396C>A | p.Asn132Lys | missense_variant | 6/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.396C>A | p.Asn132Lys | missense_variant | 6/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251426Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000442 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135888
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
251426
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
135888
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000383 AC: 56AN: 1461782Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000454 AC XY: 33AN XY: 727194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
56
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
727194
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74332
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74332
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:18
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 09, 2022 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 29, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 29, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 2/66738 European chromosomes; ClinVar: 3 labs B/LB, 1 lab VUS; at least 3 papers describe as non pathogenic - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Aug 10, 2015 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000166 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Nov 13, 2009 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 16, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 08, 2017 | Variant summary: The BRCA1 c.396C>A (p.Asn132Lys) variant (alternatively also known as 515C>A) involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide and is not located in a known functional domain, while 4/5 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. However, multiple functional studies demonstrated that this variant does not affect BRCA1 function (Towler_2013, Caligo_2009, Bouwman_2013, Maresca_2015, Thouvenot_2016). This variant was found in 2/121408 control chromosomes from ExAC at a frequency of 0.0000165, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (0.0010005). This variant has been reported in several HBOC patients without clear evidence supporting causality. The variant of interest was found to co-occur with another pathogenic BRCA2 variant, c.4936_4939delGAAA (p.Glu1646fxX23 - classified as pathogenic by LCA) has been reported, supporting a benign outcome. Multifactorial probability based model integrating multiple forms of genetic evidence indicates that the variant is benign (Lindor_2012 and Easton_2007). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases/publications classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jun 06, 2016 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Asn132Lys variant was identified in 1 of 552 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from Italian families with breast and ovarian cancer; and, functional assay(s) utilizing yeast based systems were discrepant; the variant was suggested to be neutral as it mapped outside the C-terminus domain; however, it was categorized as potentially deleterious, based on a significant induction of recombination in a yeast – HR (homologous recombination) based assay (Caligo 2008). In another functional assay measuring cell proliferation as an indicator of ability of the variant to compliment BRCA1 deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, the p.Asn132Lys variant was assessed to be neutral (Bouwman 2013). A third functional assay using HDR (homology directed recombination) to assess the 2 pathways of DNA repair BRCA1 is involved in: (DSB-double strand DNA breaks, and SSA – single strand annealing) showed that the variant had wildtype function in both assays, making it nonpathogenic (Towler 2013). Further, in a predictive posterior probability model that uses several sources of information to classify VUS, the variant was concluded to be nonpathogenic (Lindor 2012). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80357413) “With other allele”, but no frequency information was provided, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80357413s) “With likely benign allele”, Clinvitae database (2X as “benign” and 1X as “likely benign”), Fanconi Anemia Mutation Database (LOVD), ARUP Laboratories BRCA Mutations Database (as no clinical significance), the ClinVar database (classified as “benign”), the BIC database (5X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X with a “likely neutral” classification), Fanconi Anemia Mutation Database (LOVD) as likely neutral). The variant was also identified by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 2 of 66738 (European (Non-Finnish)) alleles (frequency: 2.997E-05), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The p.Asn132residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; however, this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;D;D;T;D;T;.;.;T;.;D;.;D;.;D;.
Polyphen
0.84, 1.0, 1.0, 0.99
.;P;.;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);.;Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);.;Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);.;.;Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);.;Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);Gain of methylation at N132 (P = 0.0115);
MVP
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at