17-43106489-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.179A>G(p.Gln60Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000249 in 1,604,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q60H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250812 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000138 AC: 2AN: 1452746Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 723084 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:2
- -
This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 60 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Gln60Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs373655067, gnomAD 0.008%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 18284688, 35264596, 35534704). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141093). Invitae Evidence Modeling incorporating data from in vitro experimental studies (PMID: 30209399) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA1 function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on BRCA1 function (PMID: 25823446, 30209399). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Variant summary: BRCA1 c.179A>G (p.Gln60Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 250812 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.179A>G has been observed in the presumed heterozygous state in individual(s) affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (example, Lee_2008, Guindalini_2022, deOliveria_2022), without strong evidence for causality. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one functional study reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function and showed no damaging effect of this variant on homology directed repair (HDR) activity (e.g. Findlay_2018). HDR assays qualify as a recognized gold standard on the basis of updated guidance provided by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) working group. Another study suggested this variant is benign based on Bayesian analysis (example, Clark_2022). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 35659930, 30209399, 35264596, 18284688, 35534704). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 141093). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43106489:T>C was assigned evidence codes ['BS3'] and an overall classification of Likely benign -
This missense variant replaces glutamine with arginine at codon 60 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 function in BARD1 binding and haploid cell proliferation assays and is at least partially functional in a ubiquitin E3 ligase assay (PMID: 25823446, 30209399). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 18284688) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001729). This variant has been identified in 3/282216 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
This missense variant replaces glutamine with arginine at codon 60 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 function in BARD1 binding and haploid cell proliferation assays and is at least partially functional in a ubiquitin E3 ligase assay (PMID: 25823446, 30209399). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 18284688) and in a breast cancer case-control meta-analysis in 1/60466 cases and 1/53461 unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA1_001729). This variant has been identified in 3/282216 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at