17-43106496-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4BP6

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.172C>G​(p.Pro58Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000312 in 1,604,394 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P58L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

4
5
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.97

Publications

34 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BRCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • Fanconi anemia, complementation group S
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 11 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 15 benign, 79 uncertain in NM_007294.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.4040031).
BP6
Variant 17-43106496-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43106496-G-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 54337.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_007294.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA1
NM_007294.4
MANE Select
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 23NP_009225.1
BRCA1
NM_001407581.1
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 24NP_001394510.1
BRCA1
NM_001407582.1
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 24NP_001394511.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 23ENSP00000350283.3
BRCA1
ENST00000471181.7
TSL:1
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 24ENSP00000418960.2
BRCA1
ENST00000470026.6
TSL:1
c.172C>Gp.Pro58Ala
missense
Exon 4 of 23ENSP00000419274.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000658
AC:
1
AN:
152060
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000207
AC:
3
AN:
1452216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
722830
show subpopulations
āš ļø The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33254
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44678
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26044
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39562
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
85616
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53366
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5556
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000181
AC:
2
AN:
1104146
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000167
AC:
1
AN:
59994
āš ļø The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.0245704), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.358
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74390
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15258
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Oct 22, 2019
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 58 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. Functional studies reported this variant to be functional in homology-mediated DNA repair and a haploid cell proliferation assays (PMID: 30219179, 30209399). This variant has been reported in two hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families including at least one affected carrier (PMID: 18006916, 18092194). A multiple factorial analysis found this variant to be likely benign based on evidence including tumor pathology (PMID: 31131967). This variant has been identified in 1/31378 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Sep 21, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

not specified Uncertain:1
Dec 23, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA1 c.172C>G (p.Pro58Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Zinc finger, RING-type domain (IPR001841) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 250812 control chromosomes (gnomAD, Exomes dataset). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.172C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals/families affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (Ang_2007, Seymour_2008, Wong_2016, Pereira_2022). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function concluded the variant to be functional (Findlay_2018, Starita_2018, Clark_2022). Furthermore, the variant was assigned an IARC class of Likely Benign following multifactorial likelihood analysis (Parsons_2019). One ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as likely benign and three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite it as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign.

not provided Uncertain:1
Oct 26, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is denoted BRCA1 c.172C>G at the cDNA level, p.Pro58Ala (P58A) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Proline to an Alanine (CCT>GCT). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant has been previously published as BRCA1 291C>G. This variant was observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (Ang 2007, Seymour 2008). BRCA1 Pro58Ala was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, suggesting it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Proline and Alanine differ in some properties, this is considered a semi-conservative amino acid substitution. BRCA1 Pro58Ala occurs at a position that is not conserved and is located in the RING finger domain ubiquitination site as well as BRD7 and BARD1 interaction regions (Borg 2010, Paul 2014). In silico analyses predict that this variant is probably damaging to protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether BRCA1 Pro58Ala is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance.

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Apr 12, 2024
Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43106496:G>C was assigned evidence codes ['BS3'] and an overall classification of Likely benign

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Nov 05, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.30
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.20
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.19
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.17
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.40
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.43
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.40
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.72
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.85
L
PhyloP100
2.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.95
N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.70
Sift
Benign
0.12
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.048
D
Polyphen
0.99
D
Vest4
0.57
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.49
T
GERP RS
3.0
Varity_R
0.17
gMVP
0.24
Mutation Taster
=1/99
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicevardb
2.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs397508904; hg19: chr17-41258513; API