17-43115742-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM1PM2
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.118G>A(p.Asp40Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
2
11
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.48
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
PM1
In a zinc_finger_region RING-type (size 41) in uniprot entity BRCA1_HUMAN there are 65 pathogenic changes around while only 6 benign (92%) in NM_007294.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.118G>A | p.Asp40Asn | missense_variant | 3/23 | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.118G>A | p.Asp40Asn | missense_variant | 3/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250784Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000738 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135558
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
250784
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135558
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461348Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726956
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1461348
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
726956
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:3Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center | Oct 07, 2019 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 23, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | May 31, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 12, 2024 | Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).In brief, for BRCA1 variants, if a variant was categorized as FUNC (functional), it was assigned BS3 evidence and no PS3 evidence, whereas if it was categorized as LOF (loss of function), the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. Variants categorized as INT (intermediate) were left unannotated. For the BRCA1 combining criteria, greater than or equal to 1 criteria of strong benign evidence was enough to reclassify the VUS as Likely Benign. This variant GRCh38:17:43115742:C>T was assigned evidence codes ['BS3', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely benign - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 24, 2022 | The p.D40N variant (also known as c.118G>A), located in coding exon 2 of the BRCA1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 118. The aspartic acid at codon 40 is replaced by asparagine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. One functional study found the significance of this nucleotide substitution to be uncertain in a high throughput genome editing haploid cell survival assay (Findlay GM et al. Nature, 2018 10;562:217-222). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 25, 2021 | This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BRCA1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 252392). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces aspartic acid with asparagine at codon 40 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Asp40Asn). The aspartic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between aspartic acid and asparagine. This variant has been reported not to substantially affect BRCA1 protein function (PMID: 30209399). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;T;.;.;.;T;.;T;T;.;T;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;D;N;.;N;N;N;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;D;D;T;T;T;D;.;D;T;D;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;D;D;T;T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Polyphen
0.99, 1.0
.;D;.;.;D;.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.1275);
MVP
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at