17-43115785-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):​c.81-6T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000044 in 1,612,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001504
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.174
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-43115785-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43115785-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 37703.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=3}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.81-6T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000357654.9 NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.81-6T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_007294.4 ENSP00000350283 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152180
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000401
AC:
10
AN:
249574
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000519
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
134954
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000886
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000452
AC:
66
AN:
1460434
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000413
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
726494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000558
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000663
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152180
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000847
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000378
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Dec 23, 2009- -
not provided, no classification providedin vitroBrotman Baty Institute, University of Washington-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)May 29, 2002- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylSep 06, 2017- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 24, 2021Variant summary: BRCA1 c.81-6T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 249574 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.81-6T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer (example, Judkins_2005, Simard_2007, Spearman_2008). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the BIC database (BRCA2 c.8537_8538delAG, p.Glu2846fsX22), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on Homology Directed Repair (HDR) capacity (example, Findlay_2018). Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign, n=3; likely benign, n=1; VUS, n=4). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchKing Laboratory, University of WashingtonSep 01, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 27, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMay 03, 2021The BRCA1 c.81-6T>C variant (rs80358179) is reported in the literature in several individuals with a suspicion of hereditary cancer (Judkins 2005, Simard 2007, Spearman 2008), but was not determined to be causative. The variant is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 37703) and is reported in the European (non-Finnish) population with an allele frequency of 0.009% (11/128,242 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. This is an intronic variant in a weakly conserved nucleotide, and computational analyses (Alamut v.2.11) predict that this variant may impact splicing by slightly weakening the nearby canonical acceptor splice site. However, this variant is also predicted by multiple published sources to not affect splicing (Casadei 2019, Findlay 2018, Leman 2018). Although this variant may not alter splicing, given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of the c.81-6T>C variant is uncertain at this time. References: Casadei S, Gulsuner S, Shirts BH, Mandell JB, Kortbawi HM, Norquist BS, Swisher EM, Lee MK, Goldberg Y, O'Connor R, Tan Z, Pritchard CC, King MC, Walsh T. Characterization of splice-altering mutations in inherited predisposition to cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 16;116(52):26798-807. PMID: 31843900. Judkins T et al. Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations. Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;65(21):10096-103. PMID: 16267036. Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, Janizek JD, Huang X, Starita LM, Shendure J. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):217-222. PMID: 30209399. Leman R et al. Novel diagnostic tool for prediction of variant spliceogenicity derived from a set of 395 combined in silico/in vitro studies: an international collaborative effort. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Sep 6;46(15):7913-7923. PMID: 29750258. Simard J et al. Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet. 2007 Feb;44(2):107-21. PMID: 16905680. Spearman AD et al. Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5393-400. PMID: 18824701. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 07, 2022- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJan 18, 2022- -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1 c.81-6T>C variant was identified in 1 of 512 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Simard 2007). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs80358179) as "With other, untested allele", ClinVar (3x benign, 1x likely benign, 5x uncertain significance), Clinvitae, GeneInsight-COGR (4x, uncertain significance), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (10x, likely neutral), and the BIC Database (5x, clincial importance unknown). The variant was classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (derived from Myriad reports). The variant was identified by our laboratory in five individuals with breast cancer. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 10 of 244486 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include European in 10 of 110782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009); while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. Another substitution at this same position (c.81-6T>A) has been previously identified in a breast cancer patient, and through functional studies (analysis of cDNA transcript) has been shown to create a cryptic pathogenic splice site (Vreeswijk 2009). The c.81-6T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 26, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 11, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.45
DANN
Benign
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00015
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.016
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358179; hg19: chr17-41267802; API