17-43115785-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.81-6T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000044 in 1,612,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.81-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000357654.9 | NP_009225.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.81-6T>C | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_007294.4 | ENSP00000350283 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000401 AC: 10AN: 249574Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000519 AC XY: 7AN XY: 134954
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000452 AC: 66AN: 1460434Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 30AN XY: 726494
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Dec 23, 2009 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 01, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Sep 06, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 24, 2021 | Variant summary: BRCA1 c.81-6T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 249574 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4e-05 vs 0.001), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.81-6T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer (example, Judkins_2005, Simard_2007, Spearman_2008). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported in the BIC database (BRCA2 c.8537_8538delAG, p.Glu2846fsX22), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant on Homology Directed Repair (HDR) capacity (example, Findlay_2018). Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign, n=3; likely benign, n=1; VUS, n=4). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | King Laboratory, University of Washington | Sep 01, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 27, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 03, 2021 | The BRCA1 c.81-6T>C variant (rs80358179) is reported in the literature in several individuals with a suspicion of hereditary cancer (Judkins 2005, Simard 2007, Spearman 2008), but was not determined to be causative. The variant is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 37703) and is reported in the European (non-Finnish) population with an allele frequency of 0.009% (11/128,242 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. This is an intronic variant in a weakly conserved nucleotide, and computational analyses (Alamut v.2.11) predict that this variant may impact splicing by slightly weakening the nearby canonical acceptor splice site. However, this variant is also predicted by multiple published sources to not affect splicing (Casadei 2019, Findlay 2018, Leman 2018). Although this variant may not alter splicing, given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of the c.81-6T>C variant is uncertain at this time. References: Casadei S, Gulsuner S, Shirts BH, Mandell JB, Kortbawi HM, Norquist BS, Swisher EM, Lee MK, Goldberg Y, O'Connor R, Tan Z, Pritchard CC, King MC, Walsh T. Characterization of splice-altering mutations in inherited predisposition to cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 16;116(52):26798-807. PMID: 31843900. Judkins T et al. Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations. Cancer Res. 2005 Nov 1;65(21):10096-103. PMID: 16267036. Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, Janizek JD, Huang X, Starita LM, Shendure J. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):217-222. PMID: 30209399. Leman R et al. Novel diagnostic tool for prediction of variant spliceogenicity derived from a set of 395 combined in silico/in vitro studies: an international collaborative effort. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Sep 6;46(15):7913-7923. PMID: 29750258. Simard J et al. Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet. 2007 Feb;44(2):107-21. PMID: 16905680. Spearman AD et al. Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5393-400. PMID: 18824701. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 07, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency | Apr 18, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 18, 2022 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 c.81-6T>C variant was identified in 1 of 512 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Simard 2007). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs80358179) as "With other, untested allele", ClinVar (3x benign, 1x likely benign, 5x uncertain significance), Clinvitae, GeneInsight-COGR (4x, uncertain significance), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (10x, likely neutral), and the BIC Database (5x, clincial importance unknown). The variant was classified as a benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (derived from Myriad reports). The variant was identified by our laboratory in five individuals with breast cancer. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, ARUP Laboratories, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 10 of 244486 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include European in 10 of 110782 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009); while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. Another substitution at this same position (c.81-6T>A) has been previously identified in a breast cancer patient, and through functional studies (analysis of cDNA transcript) has been shown to create a cryptic pathogenic splice site (Vreeswijk 2009). The c.81-6T>C variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. In addition, 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 26, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 11, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at