17-44008604-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_153006.3(NAGS):​c.*3C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.612 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 308,699 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.54 ( 23504 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.62 ( 285195 hom. )

Consequence

NAGS
NM_153006.3 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.132

Publications

24 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NAGS (HGNC:17996): (N-acetylglutamate synthase) The N-acetylglutamate synthase gene encodes a mitochondrial enzyme that catalyzes the formation of N-acetylglutamate (NAG) from glutamate and acetyl coenzyme-A. NAG is a cofactor of carbamyl phosphate synthetase I (CPSI), the first enzyme of the urea cycle in mammals. This gene may regulate ureagenesis by altering NAG availability and, thereby, CPSI activity. Deficiencies in N-acetylglutamate synthase have been associated with hyperammonemia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NAGS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hyperammonemia due to N-acetylglutamate synthase deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 17-44008604-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-44008604-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 262686.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.639 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NAGSNM_153006.3 linkc.*3C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000293404.8 NP_694551.1
NAGSXM_011524438.2 linkc.*3C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 6 of 6 XP_011522740.1
NAGSXM_011524439.2 linkc.*3C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 XP_011522741.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NAGSENST00000293404.8 linkc.*3C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_153006.3 ENSP00000293404.2
NAGSENST00000592915.1 linkn.1496C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 4 2
NAGSENST00000589767.1 linkc.*3C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 7 of 7 2 ENSP00000465408.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.544
AC:
82636
AN:
152032
Hom.:
23505
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.582
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.493
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.675
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.257
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.600
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.544
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.644
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.611
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.561
AC:
141067
AN:
251416
AF XY:
0.575
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.408
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.428
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.670
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.269
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.550
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.648
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.612
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.619
AC:
904040
AN:
1461328
Hom.:
285195
Cov.:
63
AF XY:
0.620
AC XY:
450711
AN XY:
726988
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.406
AC:
13580
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.440
AC:
19677
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.669
AC:
17481
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.260
AC:
10331
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.605
AC:
52173
AN:
86228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.558
AC:
29815
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.700
AC:
3786
AN:
5412
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.648
AC:
720881
AN:
1111918
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.602
AC:
36316
AN:
60344
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20677
41353
62030
82706
103383
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18730
37460
56190
74920
93650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.543
AC:
82640
AN:
152150
Hom.:
23504
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.537
AC XY:
39952
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
16987
AN:
41518
American (AMR)
AF:
0.492
AC:
7518
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.675
AC:
2345
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.257
AC:
1333
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.600
AC:
2896
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.544
AC:
5752
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.765
AC:
225
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.644
AC:
43761
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.611
AC:
1292
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1920
3840
5761
7681
9601
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
718
1436
2154
2872
3590
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.601
Hom.:
20475
Bravo
AF:
0.534
Asia WGS
AF:
0.462
AC:
1610
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.656
EpiControl
AF:
0.653

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hyperammonemia, type III Benign:4
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 18, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
-0.13
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186636; hg19: chr17-42085972; COSMIC: COSV52813006; COSMIC: COSV52813006; API