17-44372394-G-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7
The NM_000419.5(ITGA2B):c.3090C>G(p.Pro1030=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Consequence
ITGA2B
NM_000419.5 synonymous
NM_000419.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.174
Genes affected
ITGA2B (HGNC:6138): (integrin subunit alpha 2b) This gene encodes a member of the integrin alpha chain family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate light and heavy chains that associate through disulfide linkages to form a subunit of the alpha-IIb/beta-3 integrin cell adhesion receptor. This receptor plays a crucial role in the blood coagulation system, by mediating platelet aggregation. Mutations in this gene are associated with platelet-type bleeding disorders, which are characterized by a failure of platelet aggregation, including Glanzmann thrombasthenia. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.174 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITGA2B | NM_000419.5 | c.3090C>G | p.Pro1030= | synonymous_variant | 30/30 | ENST00000262407.6 | |
ITGA2B | XM_011524749.2 | c.3141C>G | p.Pro1047= | synonymous_variant | 29/29 | ||
ITGA2B | XM_011524750.2 | c.3126C>G | p.Pro1042= | synonymous_variant | 29/29 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITGA2B | ENST00000262407.6 | c.3090C>G | p.Pro1030= | synonymous_variant | 30/30 | 1 | NM_000419.5 | P1 | |
ITGA2B | ENST00000648408.1 | c.2406C>G | p.Pro802= | synonymous_variant | 25/25 | ||||
ITGA2B | ENST00000587295.5 | c.285C>G | p.Pro95= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
31
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Glanzmann thrombasthenia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at