17-44901558-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1
The ENST00000417826.3(CCDC103):c.182G>A(p.Arg61Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000141 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R61W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000417826.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC103 | NM_213607.3 | c.182G>A | p.Arg61Gln | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000417826.3 | NP_998772.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC103 | ENST00000417826.3 | c.182G>A | p.Arg61Gln | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_213607.3 | ENSP00000391692 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000362 AC: 91AN: 251486Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 44AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000141 AC: 206AN: 1461856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000143 AC XY: 104AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at