17-47300540-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_000212.3(ITGB3):c.1976G>T(p.Arg659Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R659H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000212.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000212.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGB3 | NM_000212.3 | MANE Select | c.1976G>T | p.Arg659Leu | missense | Exon 12 of 15 | NP_000203.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGB3 | ENST00000559488.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1976G>T | p.Arg659Leu | missense | Exon 12 of 15 | ENSP00000452786.2 | ||
| ENSG00000259753 | ENST00000560629.1 | TSL:2 | n.1940G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 12 of 18 | ENSP00000456711.2 | |||
| ITGB3 | ENST00000696963.1 | c.1976G>T | p.Arg659Leu | missense | Exon 12 of 14 | ENSP00000513002.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727210 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at