17-50089616-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_002204.4(ITGA3):c.*538C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0924 in 234,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,764 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002204.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- epidermolysis bullosa, junctional 7, with interstitial lung disease and nephrotic syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002204.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGA3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*538C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 26 of 26 | ENSP00000315190.8 | P26006-2 | |||
| ITGA3 | TSL:1 | n.661C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 | |||||
| ITGA3 | TSL:5 | c.*351C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 25 of 25 | ENSP00000007722.7 | P26006-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0892 AC: 13564AN: 151990Hom.: 1004 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0983 AC: 8107AN: 82498Hom.: 758 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.102 AC XY: 4319AN XY: 42542 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0893 AC: 13580AN: 152108Hom.: 1006 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0964 AC XY: 7169AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at