17-50184475-C-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.*1027G>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. There is a variant allele frequency bias in the population database for this variant (GnomAdExome4), which may indicate mosaicism or somatic mutations in the reference population data. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.054 ( 1 hom., cov: 12)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 1 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.490

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Caffey disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkc.*1027G>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 51 of 51 ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2 P02452
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkc.*1027G>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 48 of 48 XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkc.*1027G>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 49 of 49 XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkc.*1027G>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 38 of 38 XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkc.*1027G>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 51 of 51 1 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6 P02452

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0538
AC:
3735
AN:
69468
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
12
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0730
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0547
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0703
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0431
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0467
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0547
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0607
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0509
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00249
AC:
122
AN:
49034
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00268
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
22738
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00273
AC:
6
AN:
2198
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00300
AC:
4
AN:
1332
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00254
AC:
8
AN:
3148
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
11
AN:
7708
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00229
AC:
1
AN:
436
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0968
AC:
6
AN:
62
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
300
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00271
AC:
81
AN:
29870
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00126
AC:
5
AN:
3980
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.292
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
35
47
59
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.0538
AC:
3738
AN:
69456
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
12
AF XY:
0.0517
AC XY:
1722
AN XY:
33294
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0458
AC:
924
AN:
20192
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0548
AC:
328
AN:
5980
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0703
AC:
112
AN:
1594
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0323
AC:
84
AN:
2604
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0438
AC:
90
AN:
2056
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0467
AC:
154
AN:
3298
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0625
AC:
7
AN:
112
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0607
AC:
1962
AN:
32302
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0508
AC:
44
AN:
866
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.270
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
385
770
1156
1541
1926
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0246
Hom.:
33

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
May 11, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
0.49
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200882287; hg19: chr17-48261836; COSMIC: COSV56808920; COSMIC: COSV56808920; API