17-50188735-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.3099+7T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,614,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00063 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001815
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.30

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Caffey disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 17-50188735-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50188735-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 324105.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 96 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkc.3099+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 42 of 50 ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2 P02452
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkc.2901+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 39 of 47 XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkc.2829+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 40 of 48 XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkc.2181+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 29 of 37 XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkc.3099+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 42 of 50 1 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6 P02452
COL1A1ENST00000511732.1 linkn.43+7T>C splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 2
COL1A1ENST00000486572.1 linkn.-181T>C upstream_gene_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000631
AC:
96
AN:
152042
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000573
AC:
144
AN:
251380
AF XY:
0.000633
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000968
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
1742
AN:
1461858
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00122
AC XY:
887
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000447
AC:
20
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
15
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000243
AC:
13
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
1600
AN:
1111982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00136
AC:
82
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
100
201
301
402
502
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000631
AC:
96
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000632
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000145
AC:
6
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000189
AC:
2
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
84
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
1
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
11
15
19
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00108
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000744
EpiCase
AF:
0.00120
EpiControl
AF:
0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

COL1A1: BP4, BS1 -

Mar 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 28, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1 -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jun 28, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.010
DANN
Benign
0.41
PhyloP100
-3.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000018
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201682029; hg19: chr17-48266096; API