17-50192029-G-T

Variant names:

• chr17-50192029-G-T
• rs66592376
• NM_000088.4:c.1984-5C>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.1984-5C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00392 in 1,612,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 (1 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 (18 hom.)
• Consequence: COL1A1 NM_000088.4 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.002247
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:19
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.736

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00285 (434/152264) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00497 (338/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00453. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 192 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 434 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4	c.1984-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 29 of 50	ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2	c.1786-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 26 of 47		XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5	c.1984-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 29 of 48		XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5	c.1066-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 16 of 37		XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10	c.1984-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 29 of 50	1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6
COL1A1	ENST00000504289.1	n.411C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2	2
COL1A1	ENST00000476387.1	n.333-5C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 5 of 8	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00285 AC: 434 AN: 152146 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000941

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00223

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00141

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00497

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00297 AC: 725 AN: 244168 Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00286 AC XY: 378 AN XY: 132230

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000775

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00217

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.000202

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000110

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000638

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00159

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00508

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00385

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00403 AC: 5887 AN: 1459768 Hom.: 18 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00398 AC XY: 2888 AN XY: 725888

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000927

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00240

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000767

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000526

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00217

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00480

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00381

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00285 AC: 434 AN: 152264 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 192 AN XY: 74452

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000939

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00222

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00141

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00497

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00284

Alfa AF: 0.00267 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00294

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:19

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 20, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 08, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: COL1A1 c.1984-5C>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 244168 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0051 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 180 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in COL1A1 causing Osteogenesis Imperfecta phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism. Though the variant c.1984-5C>A (also called as IVS29-5C>A) has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (Venturi_2006, Schleit_2015), no strong evidence for causality was provided. These reports therefore do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Osteogenesis Imperfecta. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as VUS (1x), likely benign (3x) or benign (5x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

May 19, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 17, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 31, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 20, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

COL1A1: BP4, BS2 -

Osteogenesis imperfecta Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Sep 17, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Connective tissue disorder Uncertain:1

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1

Sep 17, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome Benign:1

Aug 01, 2023

Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

COL1A1-related disorder Benign:1

Apr 09, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Nov 04, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.75
CADD	Benign	2.2
DANN	Benign	0.82

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.0022
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.23
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs66592376; hg19: chr17-48269390;