17-50195108-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.1300-8C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0106 in 1,613,522 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 828 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 364 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0074 ( 464 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001602
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.517
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-50195108-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50195108-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 235542.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-50195108-G-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-50195108-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.129 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
COL1A1NM_000088.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1300-8C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000225964.10 NP_000079.2 P02452
COL1A1XM_011524341.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1102-8C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant XP_011522643.1
COL1A1XM_005257058.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1300-8C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant XP_005257115.2
COL1A1XM_005257059.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.957+1206C>G intron_variant XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL1A1ENST00000225964.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1300-8C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000088.4 ENSP00000225964.6 P02452
COL1A1ENST00000471344.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.244-8C>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0404
AC:
6145
AN:
152036
Hom.:
362
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0268
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
4037
AN:
250786
Hom.:
180
AF XY:
0.0153
AC XY:
2074
AN XY:
135582
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00819
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0386
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00865
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00744
AC:
10866
AN:
1461368
Hom.:
464
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00813
AC XY:
5914
AN XY:
726982
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00924
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000101
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0138
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0405
AC:
6157
AN:
152154
Hom.:
364
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0405
AC XY:
3013
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0182
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0376
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0265
Alfa
AF:
0.00415
Hom.:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 10, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsSep 28, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 13, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 07, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 01, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Infantile cortical hyperostosis;C0023931:Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0029456:Osteoporosis;C0268358:Osteogenesis imperfecta, perinatal lethal;C0268362:Osteogenesis imperfecta type III;C0268363:Osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae, dominant form;C4551623:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type;C5436842:Combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsFeb 10, 2022- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenApr 12, 2021- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018- -
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.57
DANN
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00016
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.028
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41317361; hg19: chr17-48272469; API