17-50195108-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):​c.1300-8C>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0106 in 1,613,522 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 828 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.040 ( 364 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0074 ( 464 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001602
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.517

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
COL1A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Caffey disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Ehlers-Danlos/osteogenesis imperfecta syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • high bone mass osteogenesis imperfecta
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 17-50195108-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50195108-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 235542.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.129 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000088.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL1A1
NM_000088.4
MANE Select
c.1300-8C>G
splice_region intron
N/ANP_000079.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
COL1A1
ENST00000225964.10
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1300-8C>G
splice_region intron
N/AENSP00000225964.6
COL1A1
ENST00000471344.1
TSL:2
n.244-8C>G
splice_region intron
N/A

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0404
AC:
6145
AN:
152036
Hom.:
362
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.132
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0268
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
4037
AN:
250786
AF XY:
0.0153
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00819
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00865
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00744
AC:
10866
AN:
1461368
Hom.:
464
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00813
AC XY:
5914
AN XY:
726982
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.139
AC:
4655
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00924
AC:
413
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0143
AC:
373
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0384
AC:
3311
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000282
AC:
15
AN:
53212
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
99
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1163
AN:
1111776
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
833
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
661
1322
1983
2644
3305
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
210
420
630
840
1050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0405
AC:
6157
AN:
152154
Hom.:
364
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0405
AC XY:
3013
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.132
AC:
5458
AN:
41498
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0182
AC:
279
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0173
AC:
60
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0376
AC:
181
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000377
AC:
4
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00165
AC:
112
AN:
67958
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0265
AC:
56
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
285
569
854
1138
1423
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
62
124
186
248
310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00415
Hom.:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 07, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Nov 13, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1

not provided Benign:4
Sep 28, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 10, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:2
Jul 01, 2018
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Infantile cortical hyperostosis;C0023931:Osteogenesis imperfecta type I;C0029456:Osteoporosis;C0268358:Osteogenesis imperfecta, perinatal lethal;C0268362:Osteogenesis imperfecta type III;C0268363:Osteogenesis imperfecta with normal sclerae, dominant form;C4551623:Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type;C5436842:Combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome 1 Benign:1
Feb 10, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Apr 12, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Infantile cortical hyperostosis Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
0.57
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
0.52
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00016
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.028
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41317361; hg19: chr17-48272469; API