17-58207883-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_017777.4(MKS1):c.1273+11G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00229 in 1,610,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 82 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 49 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_017777.4 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.57

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

MKS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Meckel syndrome, type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13
Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Joubert syndrome 28
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MKS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).

BP6

Variant 17-58207883-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-58207883-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260880.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0121 (1837/152266) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.042 (1743/41546). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0403. There are 49 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 886 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 49 AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MKS1	NM_017777.4 link	c.1273+11G>A		intron_variant	Intron 14 of 17	ENST00000393119.7	NP_060247.2	Q9NXB0-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MKS1	ENST00000393119.7 link	c.1273+11G>A		intron_variant	Intron 14 of 17	1	NM_017777.4	ENSP00000376827.2		Q9NXB0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0119

AC:

1817

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0416

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00452

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00526

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00329

AC:

818

AN:

248936

AF XY:

0.00261

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0437

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000620

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00215

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00127

AC:

1846

AN:

1458070

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

786

AN XY:

725658

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0406

AC:

1356

AN:

33384

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00338

AC:

151

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00138

AC:

AN:

26106

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39690

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000186

AC:

AN:

86142

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00246

AC:

AN:

5688

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000794

AC:

AN:

1108700

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

185

AN:

60244

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

210

314

419

524

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

132

176

220

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0121

AC:

1837

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0119

AC XY:

886

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0420

AC:

1743

AN:

41546

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00451

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5174

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000118

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00521

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

179

268

358

447

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00297

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0142

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00346

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 1

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.51

PhyloP100

1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over